医疗器械
工程伦理学
医学
监管科学
生物相容性材料
医学
生物医学工程
工程类
医学教育
病理
作者
Xu Song,Zhonglan Tang,Wenbo Liu,Kuan Chen,Jie Liang,Bo Yuan,Hai Lin,Xiangdong Zhu,Yujiang Fan,Xinli Shi,Peng Zhao,Lei Yang,Kai Zhang,Antonios G. Mikos,Xingdong Zhang
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jmst.2022.04.018
摘要
• This article elucidates the relationship between biomaterials & regulatory science. • Regulatory authorities approve/clear final medical products, not biomaterials. • No definition/regulation on the so-called medical-grade or implantable materials. • Regulatory science helps to assess safety and efficacy of medical products. • Safety and efficacy refer to final medical products, not biomaterials alone. The fast development of both biomaterials and regulatory science calls for a convergence, which is addressed in this article via their link through medical products of biomaterials and related safety and efficacy evaluation. The updated definition of biomaterials, and concepts of biomaterials-related medical products and so-called medical-grade and implantable materials are firstly introduced. Then a brief overview of the concept and history of regulatory science and its assessment of safety and efficacy of medical products, as well as the currently ongoing biomaterials-related regulatory science programs are presented. Finally, the opportunities provided by regulatory science for biomaterials as well as challenges on how to develop a biomaterials-based regulatory science system are discussed. As the first article in the field to elucidate the relationship between biomaterials and regulatory science, key take-home messages include (1) biomaterials alone are not medical products; (2) regulatory authorities approve/clear final medical products, not biomaterials; (3) there is no definition/regulation on the so-called medical-grade or implantable materials; and (4) safety and efficacy refer to final medical products, not biomaterials alone.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI