Conceptions of learning science among high school students in Taiwan: a phenomenographic analysis

记忆 数学教育 心理学 科学教育 现象描述学 科学学习 教育学 学习科学 科学的本质 考试(生物学) 体验式学习 生物 古生物学
作者
Chin‐Chung Tsai
出处
期刊:International Journal of Science Education [Taylor & Francis]
卷期号:26 (14): 1733-1750 被引量:223
标识
DOI:10.1080/0950069042000230776
摘要

Abstract Educators and psychologists have evidence that students’ conceptions of learning have a profound influence on the learning process, and thus are related to learning outcomes. The purpose of this paper was to explore the conceptions of learning science held by 120 Taiwanese high school students. The interview data gathered from these students, analysed by a phenomenographic method, revealed seven categories of conceptions of learning science, including: learning science as memorizing, preparing for tests, calculating and practising tutorial problems, the increase of knowledge, applying, understanding, and seeing in a new way. The educational contexts or curricular programmes in which these high school students enrolled also played a role in their conceptions of learning science. This study finally proposed a framework to describe the variations of the conceptions of learning science, consisting of the following features: the forms of knowledge acquisition, motivational orientations, and standards of evaluating learning outcomes. How to change students’ unfruitful conceptions of learning science was also discussed. Acknowledgment The funding of this study is supported by National Science Council, Taiwan, under grant contract numbers NSC 90‐2511‐S‐009‐001 and NSC 91‐2511‐S‐009‐006. Notes The interview transcripts presented in this paper were translated by the author, and were validated by a second independent researcher. The interview quotations presented are those perceived as the most representative or fruitful ideas expressed by the interviewed students. The College Entrance Examination is a nationwide test that determines many Taiwanese high school students’ entrance for college study. For S53, his conception for learning was somewhat across the first three categories (‘memorization’, ‘testing’, and ‘calculating’). However, his conception was toward a target, the tests. In some cases, the students might express mixed views across different categories. This situation was also revealed in a previous study (Marton et al. Citation1993). In order to provide a more direct and clear analysis for students’ conceptions, this study, similar to the method utilized by Tsai (Citation2002) and Koballa et al. (Citation2000), used the most dominant or fundamental category as perceived by the researchers to represent each student’s interview data (e.g. the case of S53, described in note 4). Two researchers have classified the students’ conceptions of learning science into one of the seven categories. For the interview data that did not have the researchers’ agreed categorization, the researchers reviewed the interview transcripts again and discussed case by case, and then determined a final categorization. In other words, the reliability check for categorization was undertaken. This feature is similar to that proposed by Dahlin and Regmi (Citation1997) for categorizing students’ conceptions of learning. Dahlin and Regmi viewed conceptions of learning as three levels of depth about knowledge, including acquiring, knowing, and applying. This feature is modified from Dart et al. (Citation2000). It is plausible to believe that students categorized in ‘memorizing’ and ‘calculating’ may be motivated by external factors (e.g. tests), as the assessment of science learning often involves a recall of scientific facts or a series of calculations. Although constructivism is still a controversial topic in science education (Matthews Citation2000, Niaz et al. Citation2003, Osborne Citation1996), the position of this paper, as that proposed by Staver (Citation1998) and Tobin (Citation1993), asserts that constructivism is a sound theory to help science educators understand how students learn science, as well as to explicate the practice of science and science teaching. A probably related study was conducted by Trigwell et al. (Citation1999), reporting that science teachers’ approaches to teaching were associated with their students’ approaches to learning science. Certainly, some science teachers would argue that the conceptions they have are the most instrumentally functional when confronted by the summative assessment for which they must prepare their students.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
9秒前
秋半梦完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
李爱国应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
搜集达人应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
14秒前
打地鼠工人完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
彩色半烟完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
21秒前
Ning完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
图图完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
勤奋的灯完成签到 ,获得积分10
24秒前
ludong_0完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
Asumita完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
双青豆完成签到 ,获得积分10
25秒前
27秒前
fxy完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
合适的幻然完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
沐雨汐完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
32秒前
33秒前
jiayoujijin完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
淡然思卉完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
争当科研巨匠完成签到,获得积分10
34秒前
英姑应助认真的刺猬采纳,获得10
41秒前
好大一只小坏蛋完成签到,获得积分20
41秒前
站走跑完成签到 ,获得积分10
44秒前
步步高完成签到,获得积分10
46秒前
无私的雪瑶完成签到 ,获得积分10
46秒前
小杨完成签到,获得积分20
47秒前
小花完成签到 ,获得积分10
52秒前
宁夕完成签到 ,获得积分10
56秒前
西宁完成签到,获得积分10
56秒前
拼搏的羊青完成签到 ,获得积分10
57秒前
科目三应助asd113采纳,获得10
57秒前
deng203完成签到 ,获得积分20
59秒前
1分钟前
时米米米完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
浅浅完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
帅气的藏鸟完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Handbook of Industrial Diamonds.Vol2 1100
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 550
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4038066
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3575779
关于积分的说明 11373801
捐赠科研通 3305584
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1819239
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 892655
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815022