Conceptions of learning science among high school students in Taiwan: a phenomenographic analysis

记忆 数学教育 心理学 科学教育 现象描述学 科学学习 教育学 学习科学 科学的本质 考试(生物学) 体验式学习 生物 古生物学
作者
Chin‐Chung Tsai
出处
期刊:International Journal of Science Education [Taylor & Francis]
卷期号:26 (14): 1733-1750 被引量:223
标识
DOI:10.1080/0950069042000230776
摘要

Abstract Educators and psychologists have evidence that students’ conceptions of learning have a profound influence on the learning process, and thus are related to learning outcomes. The purpose of this paper was to explore the conceptions of learning science held by 120 Taiwanese high school students. The interview data gathered from these students, analysed by a phenomenographic method, revealed seven categories of conceptions of learning science, including: learning science as memorizing, preparing for tests, calculating and practising tutorial problems, the increase of knowledge, applying, understanding, and seeing in a new way. The educational contexts or curricular programmes in which these high school students enrolled also played a role in their conceptions of learning science. This study finally proposed a framework to describe the variations of the conceptions of learning science, consisting of the following features: the forms of knowledge acquisition, motivational orientations, and standards of evaluating learning outcomes. How to change students’ unfruitful conceptions of learning science was also discussed. Acknowledgment The funding of this study is supported by National Science Council, Taiwan, under grant contract numbers NSC 90‐2511‐S‐009‐001 and NSC 91‐2511‐S‐009‐006. Notes The interview transcripts presented in this paper were translated by the author, and were validated by a second independent researcher. The interview quotations presented are those perceived as the most representative or fruitful ideas expressed by the interviewed students. The College Entrance Examination is a nationwide test that determines many Taiwanese high school students’ entrance for college study. For S53, his conception for learning was somewhat across the first three categories (‘memorization’, ‘testing’, and ‘calculating’). However, his conception was toward a target, the tests. In some cases, the students might express mixed views across different categories. This situation was also revealed in a previous study (Marton et al. Citation1993). In order to provide a more direct and clear analysis for students’ conceptions, this study, similar to the method utilized by Tsai (Citation2002) and Koballa et al. (Citation2000), used the most dominant or fundamental category as perceived by the researchers to represent each student’s interview data (e.g. the case of S53, described in note 4). Two researchers have classified the students’ conceptions of learning science into one of the seven categories. For the interview data that did not have the researchers’ agreed categorization, the researchers reviewed the interview transcripts again and discussed case by case, and then determined a final categorization. In other words, the reliability check for categorization was undertaken. This feature is similar to that proposed by Dahlin and Regmi (Citation1997) for categorizing students’ conceptions of learning. Dahlin and Regmi viewed conceptions of learning as three levels of depth about knowledge, including acquiring, knowing, and applying. This feature is modified from Dart et al. (Citation2000). It is plausible to believe that students categorized in ‘memorizing’ and ‘calculating’ may be motivated by external factors (e.g. tests), as the assessment of science learning often involves a recall of scientific facts or a series of calculations. Although constructivism is still a controversial topic in science education (Matthews Citation2000, Niaz et al. Citation2003, Osborne Citation1996), the position of this paper, as that proposed by Staver (Citation1998) and Tobin (Citation1993), asserts that constructivism is a sound theory to help science educators understand how students learn science, as well as to explicate the practice of science and science teaching. A probably related study was conducted by Trigwell et al. (Citation1999), reporting that science teachers’ approaches to teaching were associated with their students’ approaches to learning science. Certainly, some science teachers would argue that the conceptions they have are the most instrumentally functional when confronted by the summative assessment for which they must prepare their students.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
master-f完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
9秒前
挪威的森林完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
隐形的非笑完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
科研通AI5应助大力听芹采纳,获得10
11秒前
悠雯完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
传奇3应助Emily采纳,获得10
14秒前
三脸茫然完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
15秒前
端庄半凡完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
26秒前
song完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
30秒前
spring完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
Emily发布了新的文献求助10
37秒前
贰鸟应助悠雯采纳,获得10
44秒前
搜集达人应助U9A采纳,获得10
44秒前
兴钬完成签到 ,获得积分10
47秒前
胖胖橘完成签到 ,获得积分10
57秒前
ayayaya完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
辛勤的泽洋完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
小粒橙完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
糖宝完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
MC123完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
Owen应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
Driscoll完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
少年完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
科科通通完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
ARIA完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
科研通AI2S应助U9A采纳,获得10
1分钟前
温暖小松鼠完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
yy完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
zeannezg完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
ng完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
隐形曼青应助称心的新之采纳,获得10
2分钟前
落后的怀梦完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
唠叨的可燕完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind 1000
Technical Brochure TB 814: LPIT applications in HV gas insulated switchgear 1000
Immigrant Incorporation in East Asian Democracies 600
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
A Preliminary Study on Correlation Between Independent Components of Facial Thermal Images and Subjective Assessment of Chronic Stress 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3968559
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3513358
关于积分的说明 11167368
捐赠科研通 3248732
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1794465
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 875065
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 804664