已入深夜,您辛苦了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!祝你早点完成任务,早点休息,好梦!

Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Comparison of Amitriptyline, Duloxetine, and Pregabalin in Patients With Chronic Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathic Pain

度洛西汀 普瑞巴林 医学 麻醉 安慰剂 阿米替林 加巴喷丁 止痛药 神经病理性疼痛 病理 替代医学
作者
Julia Boyle,Malin Eriksson,Laura Gribble,R Gouni,Sigurd Johnsen,David Coppini,David Kerr
出处
期刊:Diabetes Care [American Diabetes Association]
卷期号:35 (12): 2451-2458 被引量:208
标识
DOI:10.2337/dc12-0656
摘要

OBJECTIVE Chronic diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) is difficult to treat, with treatment regimens often inadequate at controlling pain and limited by side effects and drug tolerance. Secondary parameters, such as quality of sleep and mood, may also be important for successful DPNP management. The objectives of this study were to compare the analgesic efficacy of pregabalin, amitriptyline, and duloxetine, and their effect on polysomnographic sleep, daytime functioning, and quality of life in patients with DPNP. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS This was a double-blind, randomized, parallel group investigation of type 1 and 2 diabetic subjects with DPNP. Each treatment group had a single-blind, 8-day, placebo run-in followed by 14 days of lower-dose and 14 days of higher-dose medication. At the end of each dose titration period, subjective pain, sleep, and daytime functioning were assessed during a 2-day residential period. RESULTS All medications reduced pain when compared with placebo, but no one treatment was superior to any other. For sleep, pregabalin improved sleep continuity (P < 0.001), whereas duloxetine increased wake and reduced total sleep time (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001). Despite negative effects on sleep, duloxetine enhanced central nervous system arousal and performance on sensory motor tasks. There were no significant safety findings; however, there was a significantly higher number of adverse events in the pregabalin treatment group. CONCLUSIONS There was no significant difference in analgesic efficacy between amitriptyline, duloxetine, and pregabalin. However, there were significant differences in the secondary parameters, which may be of relevance when deciding the optimal treatment for DPNP.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
小马甲应助修利采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
田柾国发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
tczw667完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
Perion完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
ding应助Rencc采纳,获得10
14秒前
17秒前
布同完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
修利发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
二十三发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
EED完成签到 ,获得积分10
27秒前
Bearling完成签到,获得积分10
33秒前
36秒前
小马甲应助大方煎蛋采纳,获得10
39秒前
39秒前
科研通AI2S应助张宝采纳,获得10
41秒前
42秒前
襟花发布了新的文献求助10
47秒前
49秒前
hjj完成签到,获得积分10
49秒前
hjj发布了新的文献求助10
56秒前
疯狂喵完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
包容新蕾完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
嗯哼应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
1分钟前
无花果应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
YZH应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
斯文败类应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
1分钟前
1分钟前
Ni发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
阿翼完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
登登发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
meng完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
登登完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
玖月完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
脆饼同学完成签到 ,获得积分20
1分钟前
斯文败类应助阳光以筠采纳,获得10
1分钟前
高分求助中
Earth System Geophysics 1000
Co-opetition under Endogenous Bargaining Power 666
Medicina di laboratorio. Logica e patologia clinica 600
Sarcolestes leedsi Lydekker, an ankylosaurian dinosaur from the Middle Jurassic of England 500
《关于整治突出dupin问题的实施意见》(厅字〔2019〕52号) 500
Language injustice and social equity in EMI policies in China 500
mTOR signalling in RPGR-associated Retinitis Pigmentosa 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3213078
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2861888
关于积分的说明 8130887
捐赠科研通 2527823
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1361727
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 643516
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 615849