Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Trial of Lithium in Episodic Cluster Headache

安慰剂 锂(药物) 医学 丛集性头痛 碳酸锂 不利影响 麻醉 安慰剂对照研究 临床试验 随机对照试验 内科学 双盲 离子 物理 量子力学 离子键合 替代医学 病理 偏头痛
作者
TJ Steiner,R Hering,EGM Couturier,P. T. G. Davies,TE Whitmarsh
出处
期刊:Cephalalgia [SAGE Publishing]
卷期号:17 (6): 673-675 被引量:137
标识
DOI:10.1046/j.1468-2982.1997.1706673.x
摘要

Lithium is widely used in the prophylaxis of episodic cluster headache without formal evidence of efficacy. Placebo-controlled clinical trials are not easy in conditions characterized by frequent severe pain. In this study, it was assumed that lithium would work quickly if at all, and placebo response would be zero. Strict diagnostic criteria excluded uncertain or atypical cases Patients were male in so-far untreated episodes expected to last for at least 3 weeks more. In a double-blind, placebo-controlled comparison of matched parallel groups, treatment was either slow-release lithium carbonate, 800 mg/day, or placebo. After 7 days, compliance was estimated by tablet count, blood was taken for lithium assay, efficacy was assessed (attacks stopped or substantially improved) and adverse reactions were recorded. The study was stopped after planned sequential analysis of the 27th patient (13 on lithium, 14 on placebo). Estimated compliance was usually but not always good. Plasma lithium levels were mostly in the range 0.5–0.6 mmol/1 on lithium, zero on placebo. Cessation of attacks within 1 week occurred in two patients in each group, substantial improvement in 6/14 (43%) on placebo, 8/13 (62%; NS) on lithium. Only minor adverse events were reported. Lithium treatment was therefore associated with a useful subjective improvement rate but the assumptions made at outset had proved wrong. The trial was stopped because superiority over placebo could not be demonstrated. There were lessons for future trials. □ Episodic cluster headache, lithium, placebo response, randomized controlled trial, treatment
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
JamesPei应助liyu采纳,获得10
刚刚
安静的静槐完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
美好乐松应助andrewyu采纳,获得10
刚刚
迟大猫应助andrewyu采纳,获得10
刚刚
刚刚
机智羞花完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
英姑应助开心的西瓜采纳,获得10
2秒前
俊逸的翠容关注了科研通微信公众号
3秒前
陈文文完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
猫樊应助机智羞花采纳,获得20
5秒前
2805197480发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
上官若男应助yyyyy语言采纳,获得10
7秒前
勤恳的雪卉完成签到,获得积分0
9秒前
共享精神应助太阳cy采纳,获得10
9秒前
小葵完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
13秒前
共享精神应助Nadine采纳,获得10
13秒前
13秒前
徐佳达完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
东东完成签到,获得积分20
14秒前
丘比特应助5656采纳,获得10
14秒前
15秒前
15秒前
17秒前
刘胖胖发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
科研通AI5应助俊逸的翠容采纳,获得10
18秒前
东东发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
19秒前
steph发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
太阳cy发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
jojo完成签到 ,获得积分10
22秒前
无花果应助CHOU采纳,获得10
24秒前
Orange应助七只狐狸采纳,获得10
25秒前
Jasper应助刘胖胖采纳,获得10
25秒前
廾匸发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
26秒前
26秒前
懒懒洋洋洋完成签到 ,获得积分10
26秒前
26秒前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
The First Nuclear Era: The Life and Times of a Technological Fixer 500
ALUMINUM STANDARDS AND DATA 500
Walter Gilbert: Selected Works 500
岡本唐貴自伝的回想画集 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3667816
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3226284
关于积分的说明 9768970
捐赠科研通 2936235
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1608336
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 759642
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 735434