可靠性(半导体)
比例(比率)
心理学
结构效度
克朗巴赫阿尔法
等级间信度
有效性
内容有效性
医学教育
组内相关
应用心理学
评定量表
内部一致性
心理测量学
医学
自我评估
内部评级可靠性
作者
Xiangping Chen,Yiyu Zhuang,Lijie Qiao,Jun Chen,Yuewen Lao,Li Wang,Xiaowei Gong,Xiaohui He,Liping Zhou,Xin Qian,Jin Cui
出处
期刊:The Journal of practical nursing
日期:2019-03-11
卷期号:35 (8): 572-578
标识
DOI:10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2019.08.003
摘要
Objective
To translate and revise the Assessment of Interprofessional Team Collaboration Scale (AITCS) into Chinese, then to evaluate the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of AITCS.
Methods
The Chinese version of AITCS was translated from the original one, back-translated and adjusted for cultural adaptation. The reliability and validity were tested among 288 nurses, 81 physicians, 25 respiratory therapists, 10 physical therapists and 3 nutritionists from a tertiary hospital in Hangzhou using convenience sampling.
Results
The average of scale-level content validity index was 0.98, unanimity of scale-level content validity index was 0.84 and item-level content validity index was 0.89-1.00. Exploratory factor analysis extracted three common factors,which explained 61.427% of the total variance, and each item had high factor loading quality (>0.4). The correlations coefficients between each dimension score and the total score ranged from 0.801 to 0.898 (P<0.05), and the correlations coefficients between each dimension score ranged from 0.607 to 0.698 (P<0.05). The Cronbach α of AITCS was 0.909, split-half reliability was 0.835 and test-retest reliability was 0.763.
Conclusion
The Chinese version of the AITCS has been proved to be reliable and valid. It is a valuable tool for evaluating interprofessional team collaboration among the health professional providers in mainland China.
Key words:
Interprofessional team collaboration; Reliability; Validity
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI