合法性
过程(计算)
经济正义
机器人
考试(生物学)
法学
要素(刑法)
公平审判
计算机科学
人权
法律与经济学
心理学
政治学
人工智能
社会学
操作系统
政治
古生物学
生物
出处
期刊:Asian Journal of Law and Economics
[De Gruyter]
日期:2020-07-21
卷期号:11 (2)
被引量:51
标识
DOI:10.1515/ajle-2020-0008
摘要
Abstract This paper seeks to examine the potential influences AI may have on the right to a fair trial when it is used in the courtroom. Essentially, AI systems can assume two roles in the courtroom. On the one hand, “AI assistants” can support judges in their decision-making process by predicting and preparing judicial decisions; on the other hand, “robot judges” can replace human judges and decide cases autonomously in fully automated court proceedings. Both roles will be tested against the requirements of the right to a fair trial as protected by Article 6 ECHR. An important element in this test is the role that a human judge plays in legal proceedings. As the justice system is a social process, the AI assistant is preferred to a situation in which a robot judge would completely replace human judges. Based on extensive literature, various examples and case studies, this paper concludes that the use of AI assistants can better serve legitimacy and guarantee a fair trial.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI