投标
稳健性(进化)
计算机科学
盈利能力指数
计算
定量分析(化学)
灵敏度(控制系统)
可靠性(半导体)
可靠性工程
运筹学
工程类
经济
算法
微观经济学
财务
物理
基因
量子力学
生物化学
功率(物理)
色谱法
化学
电子工程
标识
DOI:10.1080/10286608.2020.1821670
摘要
Competitive bidding is the main mechanism for the allocation and price determination of construction services in the Architecture, Engineering, and Construction industry. Quantitative bidding methods have received considerable attention in the literature. The validity and reliability of these methods (particularly Freidman and Gates) have been explored using mathematical and statistical analysis. This study aims to compare and examine the characteristics of major quantitative bidding methods under different market scenarios using an agent-based approach as a computational laboratory. The results indicate that using the Friedman model can result in obtaining higher market share and working capital whereas using the Gates model can result in gaining higher profitability in the long run. Finally, the simulation model is verified by breaking down the model into several computation steps and validated using sensitivity analysis, robustness analysis, and structural validation.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI