Biomechanical Imaging Markers as Predictors of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Growth or Rupture: A Systematic Review

医学 荟萃分析 混淆 腹主动脉瘤 科克伦图书馆 出版偏见 内科学 梅德林 动脉瘤 研究异质性 系统回顾 放射科 政治学 法学
作者
Reza Indrakusuma,Hamid Jalalzadeh,R. Nils Planken,Henk A. Marquering,Dink A. Legemate,M.J.W. Koelemay,Ron Balm
出处
期刊:European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:52 (4): 475-486 被引量:37
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.07.003
摘要

ObjectivesBiomechanical characteristics, such as wall stress, are important in the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and can be visualised and quantified using imaging techniques. This systematic review aims to present an overview of all biomechanical imaging markers that have been studied in relation to AAA growth and rupture.MethodsThis systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines. A search in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library identified 1503 potentially relevant articles. Studies were included if they assessed biomechanical imaging markers and their potential association with growth or rupture.ResultsTwenty-seven articles comprising 1730 patients met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen studies performed wall stress analysis using finite element analysis (FEA), 13 of which used peak wall stress (PWS) to quantify wall stress. Ten of 13 case control FEA studies reported a significantly higher PWS for symptomatic or ruptured AAAs than for intact AAAs. However, in some studies there was confounding bias because of baseline differences in aneurysm diameter between groups. Clinical heterogeneity in methodology obstructed a meaningful meta-analysis of PWS. Three of five FEA studies reported a significant positive association between several wall stress markers, such as PWS and 99th percentile stress, and growth. One study reported a significant negative association and one other study reported no significant association. Studies assessing wall compliance, the augmentation index and wall stress analysis using Laplace's law, computational fluid dynamics and fluid structure interaction were also included in this systematic review.ConclusionsAlthough PWS is significantly higher in symptomatic or ruptured AAAs in most FEA studies, confounding bias, clinical heterogeneity, and lack of standardisation limit the interpretation and generalisability of the results. Also, there is conflicting evidence on whether increased wall stress is associated with growth. Biomechanical characteristics, such as wall stress, are important in the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) and can be visualised and quantified using imaging techniques. This systematic review aims to present an overview of all biomechanical imaging markers that have been studied in relation to AAA growth and rupture. This systematic review followed the PRISMA guidelines. A search in Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library identified 1503 potentially relevant articles. Studies were included if they assessed biomechanical imaging markers and their potential association with growth or rupture. Twenty-seven articles comprising 1730 patients met the inclusion criteria. Eighteen studies performed wall stress analysis using finite element analysis (FEA), 13 of which used peak wall stress (PWS) to quantify wall stress. Ten of 13 case control FEA studies reported a significantly higher PWS for symptomatic or ruptured AAAs than for intact AAAs. However, in some studies there was confounding bias because of baseline differences in aneurysm diameter between groups. Clinical heterogeneity in methodology obstructed a meaningful meta-analysis of PWS. Three of five FEA studies reported a significant positive association between several wall stress markers, such as PWS and 99th percentile stress, and growth. One study reported a significant negative association and one other study reported no significant association. Studies assessing wall compliance, the augmentation index and wall stress analysis using Laplace's law, computational fluid dynamics and fluid structure interaction were also included in this systematic review. Although PWS is significantly higher in symptomatic or ruptured AAAs in most FEA studies, confounding bias, clinical heterogeneity, and lack of standardisation limit the interpretation and generalisability of the results. Also, there is conflicting evidence on whether increased wall stress is associated with growth.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
罗马没有马完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
无辜的猎豹完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
SYLH应助王士钰采纳,获得20
6秒前
跳脚的虾完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
JSEILWQ完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
innocent完成签到,获得积分10
16秒前
彩色靖儿完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
岚12完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
JUAN完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
陶醉的翠霜完成签到 ,获得积分10
28秒前
Novice6354完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
心灵美绝施完成签到 ,获得积分10
34秒前
大雪完成签到 ,获得积分10
40秒前
呆橘完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
22222应助yhm7426采纳,获得50
41秒前
42秒前
life的半边天完成签到 ,获得积分10
48秒前
灵巧的十八完成签到 ,获得积分10
49秒前
空曲完成签到 ,获得积分10
54秒前
小文子完成签到 ,获得积分10
55秒前
可可可爱完成签到 ,获得积分10
56秒前
鹏826完成签到 ,获得积分0
58秒前
zjq完成签到 ,获得积分10
58秒前
李爱国应助故意的鼠标采纳,获得10
59秒前
牧绯完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
Superman完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
乘风破浪完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
贝贝完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Arctic完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
调皮蛋完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
reset完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
suodeheng完成签到,获得积分20
1分钟前
SY15732023811完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
www完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
leo完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
天天快乐应助帅气的宛凝采纳,获得10
1分钟前
RandyChen完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
kehe!完成签到 ,获得积分0
1分钟前
高分求助中
A new approach to the extrapolation of accelerated life test data 1000
Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind 1000
Technical Brochure TB 814: LPIT applications in HV gas insulated switchgear 1000
Immigrant Incorporation in East Asian Democracies 600
Nucleophilic substitution in azasydnone-modified dinitroanisoles 500
不知道标题是什么 500
A Preliminary Study on Correlation Between Independent Components of Facial Thermal Images and Subjective Assessment of Chronic Stress 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3968559
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3513391
关于积分的说明 11167370
捐赠科研通 3248808
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1794465
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 875116
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 804664