Which cutoff value of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment should be used for post-stroke cognitive impairment? A systematic review and meta-analysis on diagnostic test accuracy

蒙特利尔认知评估 医学 荟萃分析 切断 冲程(发动机) 诊断优势比 科克伦图书馆 奇纳 接收机工作特性 认知 二元分析 优势比 物理疗法 认知障碍 内科学 精神科 心理干预 统计 工程类 物理 机械工程 量子力学 数学
作者
Xiaoqin Wei,Yuxia Ma,Tingting Wu,Yiyi Yang,Yue Yuan,Jiangxia Qin,Zhaowen Bu,Fanghong Yan,Ziyao Zhang,Lin Han
出处
期刊:International Journal of Stroke [SAGE]
卷期号:18 (8): 908-916 被引量:20
标识
DOI:10.1177/17474930231178660
摘要

Background: Post-stroke cognitive impairment (PSCI) is one of the serious complications of stroke. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), as a brief cognitive impairment screening tool, is widely used in stroke survivors. However, some studies have suggested that the use of the universal cutoff value of 26 may be inappropriate for detecting cognitive impairments in stroke settings. Aim: We conducted this study to identify the optimal cutoff value of the MoCA in screening for PSCI. Methods: PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched for eligible studies until March 23, 2023. All studies were screened by two independent researchers. The quality of each article was evaluated by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool. A bivariate mixed-effects model was used to pool sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, diagnostic odds ratio, and the summary receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: Twenty-four studies with a total of 4231 patients were included in this review. Despite the lack of evidence of publication bias, a high degree of heterogeneity was observed. A meta-analysis revealed that a cutoff value of 21/22 yielded the best diagnostic accuracy. The optimal cutoff varied in different regions, stroke types, and stroke phases as well. Conclusion: The optimal cutoff of MoCA was 21/22 for stroke populations rather than the initially recommended cutoff of 26. A revised (lower) cutoff should be considered for stroke survivors.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
Lau完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
tq完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
一只羊完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
嘟嘟完成签到 ,获得积分10
2秒前
3秒前
Akim应助李昕123采纳,获得20
3秒前
地理汪汪发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
4秒前
在水一方应助lili采纳,获得10
4秒前
诺坎普的晚风完成签到,获得积分20
4秒前
6秒前
浮游应助料峭声花采纳,获得10
6秒前
JamesPei应助明白放弃采纳,获得10
7秒前
7秒前
WWW完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
酸酸给酸酸的求助进行了留言
9秒前
11秒前
11秒前
lijiauyi1994发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
lili完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
Lucas应助vayne采纳,获得10
14秒前
有魅力的沧海完成签到 ,获得积分10
15秒前
科研通AI6应助地理汪汪采纳,获得10
15秒前
lll发布了新的文献求助20
16秒前
所所应助白三采纳,获得10
16秒前
xiaoyao完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
JiuYu发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
yang完成签到,获得积分20
17秒前
小米粥发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
咿呀咿呀完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
19秒前
20秒前
小高完成签到 ,获得积分10
23秒前
粥粥小弦应助酸酸采纳,获得20
24秒前
25秒前
26秒前
阿峤完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
The Social Work Ethics Casebook: Cases and Commentary (revised 2nd ed.).. Frederic G. Reamer 1070
Alloy Phase Diagrams 1000
Introduction to Early Childhood Education 1000
2025-2031年中国兽用抗生素行业发展深度调研与未来趋势报告 1000
List of 1,091 Public Pension Profiles by Region 871
Synthesis and properties of compounds of the type A (III) B2 (VI) X4 (VI), A (III) B4 (V) X7 (VI), and A3 (III) B4 (V) X9 (VI) 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 物理化学 基因 遗传学 催化作用 冶金 量子力学 光电子学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5422108
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4537012
关于积分的说明 14155721
捐赠科研通 4453595
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2442968
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1434374
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1411439