Comparative cone-beam computed tomographic evaluation of maxillary incisor intrusion and associated root resorption: Intrusion arch vs mini-implants

Various literature has verified that apical root resorption is a common adverse effect of orthodontic treatment, particularly intrusion. Conventional radiographic techniques underestimated root lengths and overestimated tooth lengths. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) is a useful diagnostic tool to detect orthodontically induced external apical root resorption. This prospective study aimed to compare maxillary incisor intrusion and associated root resorption via CBCT.Thirty patients aged 16-23 years, having a deepbite of 6-8 mm and excessive gingival display on smiling, were divided into 2 groups: group 1, with 15 patients who were treated with Burstone intrusion arch, and group 2 with 15 patients who were treated with mini-implants applying 100 g of intrusive force for 4 months with activation done every 4 weeks. During this 4-month study period, no treatment was performed other than the intrusion of incisors. CBCT scans were obtained before and after the intrusion phase of treatment to compare the amount of intrusion and associated root resorption among both groups.No significant difference was found in mean incisor intrusion between groups 1 and 2 (P = 0.772), with slightly more proclination of incisors in group 1, resulting in a significant (P = 0.018) increase in the vertical change of incisal edge in group 1. A statistically significant difference was found in root resorption among both groups (P = 0.004), with more root resorption in group 2.The results of this study indicate intrusion with both the intrusion systems using appropriate intrusive forces is effective in opening the bite with slightly more external apical root resorption in the mini-implant group.