Middle Meningeal Arterial Embolization Combined With Drilling in the Treatment of Acute Epidural Hematoma

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the technical feasibility and safety of middle meningeal arterial (MMA) embolization combined with drilling drainage in the treatment of acute epidural hematoma (AEDH) by comparing it with traditional craniotomy in the treatment. Methods: One hundred seventeen patients with AEDH treated for MMA embolization combined with drilling and drainage or craniotomy hematoma removal from January 2017 to September 2020 were retrospectively analyzed and divided into a craniotomy group (n=85) and a minimally invasive group (n=32). Hematoma removal was performed in the craniotomy group, and MMA embolization combined with drilling and drainage was performed in the minimally invasive group. The general clinical data, imaging data, surgery, and follow-up of the 2 groups were compared and analyzed. Results: Compared with the craniotomy group, the residual hematoma volume in the minimally invasive group was higher than in the craniotomy group. The average postoperative drainage duration in the minimally invasive group was longer than in the craniotomy group. Compared with the craniotomy group, the minimally invasive group was associated with shorter operative time, less intraoperative bleeding, and lower rates of postoperative rebleeding. In addition, the incidence of postoperative complications and length of hospitalization in the minimally invasive group were significantly shortened. Conclusion: Middle meningeal arterial embolization combined with drilling and drainage in the treatment of AEDH caused by MMA active bleeding is safe, effective, and more minimally invasive, and can be promoted and applied.