Probiotics for adults with major depressive disorder compared with antidepressants: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

依西酞普兰 重性抑郁障碍 医学 荟萃分析 安慰剂 背景(考古学) 文拉法辛 内科学 舍曲林 度洛西汀 临床试验 随机对照试验 心理干预 精神科 萧条(经济学) 系统回顾 西酞普兰 心情 抗抑郁药 梅德林 焦虑 替代医学 古生物学 宏观经济学 病理 生物 政治学 法学 经济
作者
Shilin Zhao,Suisha Liang,Jun Tao,Peng Ye,Siqi Chen,Hogan Kok-Fung Wai,Feng-Ying Chung,Zhen Ye Sin,Matthew K L Wong,Andrea M. Haqq,Wing Chung Chang,Michael Y. Ni,Francis K.L. Chan,Siew C. Ng,Hein M. Tun
出处
期刊:Nutrition Reviews [Oxford University Press]
被引量:5
标识
DOI:10.1093/nutrit/nuad171
摘要

Abstract Context Despite recent advances in antidepressants in treating major depression (MDD), their usage is marred by adverse effects and social stigmas. Probiotics may be an efficacious adjunct or standalone treatment, potentially circumventing the aforementioned issues with antidepressants. However, there is a lack of head-to-head clinical trials between these 2 interventions. Objective A systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the efficacy and acceptability of these 2 interventions in treating MDD. Data Sources Six databases and registry platforms for the clinical trial were systematically searched to identify the eligible double-blinded, randomized controlled trials published between 2015 and 2022. Data Exaction Two authors selected independently the placebo-controlled trials of antidepressants and microbiota-targeted interventions (prebiotics, probiotics, and synbiotics) used for the treatment of MDD in adults (≥18 years old). Standardized mean differences (SMDs) of depressive symptom scores from individual trials were pooled for network meta-analysis (PROSPERO no. CRD42020222305). Results Forty-two eligible trials covering 22 interventions were identified, of which 16 were found to be effective in MDD treatment and the certainty of evidence was moderate to very low. When all trials were considered, compared with placebo, SMDs of interventions ranged from −0.16 (95% credible interval: −0.30, −0.04) for venlafaxine to −0.81 (−1.06, −0.52) for escitalopram. Probiotics were superior to brexpiprazole (SMD [95% credible interval]: −0.42 [−0.68, −0.17]), cariprazine (−0.44 [−0.69, −0.24]), citalopram (−0.37 [−0.66, −0.07]), duloxetine (−0.26, [−0.51, −0.04]), desvenlafaxine (−0.38 [−0.63, −0.14]), ketamine (−0.32 [−0.66, −0.01]), venlafaxine (−0.47 [−0.73, −0.23]), vilazodone (−0.37 [−0.61, −0.12]), vortioxetine (−0.39 [−0.63, −0.15]), and placebo (−0.62 [−0.86, −0.42]), and were noninferior to other antidepressants. In addition, probiotics ranked the second highest in the treatment hierarchy after escitalopram. Long-term treatment (≥8 weeks) using probiotics showed the same tolerability as antidepressants. Conclusion Probiotics, compared with antidepressants and placebo, may be efficacious as an adjunct or standalone therapy for treating MDD. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO registration no. CRD42020222305.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
慕新完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
暴躁的老哥应助平淡夏云采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
香蕉觅云应助Valky采纳,获得10
4秒前
8秒前
8秒前
交院完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
端庄大白完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
领导范儿应助狂野世立采纳,获得10
10秒前
15秒前
吧嗒嗒发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
16秒前
18秒前
zz应助melo采纳,获得10
19秒前
Valky发布了新的文献求助10
22秒前
中和皇极应助玛卡巴卡采纳,获得10
26秒前
不想搞学术完成签到,获得积分10
26秒前
26秒前
27秒前
29秒前
搜集达人应助沙脑采纳,获得10
29秒前
寒冷半雪完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
30秒前
鲤鱼丹蝶发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
杨玄发布了新的文献求助10
31秒前
李健应助Valky采纳,获得10
36秒前
鲤鱼丹蝶完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
科目三应助深情曼冬采纳,获得10
39秒前
41秒前
41秒前
44秒前
45秒前
沙脑发布了新的文献求助10
46秒前
传奇3应助任性的冷梅采纳,获得10
46秒前
大道无形我有型完成签到,获得积分10
47秒前
一一应助香蕉闭月采纳,获得10
47秒前
细心灭龙发布了新的文献求助10
47秒前
48秒前
48秒前
思源应助zxh123采纳,获得10
48秒前
高分求助中
Востребованный временем 2500
Agaricales of New Zealand 1: Pluteaceae - Entolomataceae 1040
지식생태학: 생태학, 죽은 지식을 깨우다 600
海南省蛇咬伤流行病学特征与预后影响因素分析 500
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 500
ランス多機能化技術による溶鋼脱ガス処理の高効率化の研究 500
Relativism, Conceptual Schemes, and Categorical Frameworks 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 材料科学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 纳米技术 内科学 物理 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 细胞生物学 免疫学 电极
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3462725
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3056239
关于积分的说明 9051164
捐赠科研通 2745868
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1506668
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 696188
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 695720