医学
奥拉帕尼
前列腺癌
阿比曲酮
安慰剂
内科学
肿瘤科
恩扎鲁胺
人口
临床终点
危险系数
癌症
泌尿科
临床试验
药理学
替代医学
病理
化学
聚ADP核糖聚合酶
基因
环境卫生
聚合酶
雄激素受体
生物化学
置信区间
作者
Jaleh Fallah,Jianjin Xu,Chana Weinstock,Michael Brave,Erik Bloomquist,Mallorie H. Fiero,Timothy J. Schaefer,Anand Pathak,Abde M. Abukhdeir,Vishal Bhatnagar,Haw-Jyh Chiu,Tiffany K. Ricks,Christy S. John,Salaheldin S. Hamed,Christal Lee,William F. Pierce,Shyam Kalavar,Reena Philip,Shenghui Tang,Laleh Amiri‐Kordestani,Richard Pazdur,Paul G. Kluetz,Daniel L. Suzman
摘要
PURPOSE This article summarizes the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) review of the data leading to approval of olaparib plus abiraterone for the treatment of patients with deleterious or suspected deleterious BRCA-mutated ( BRCAm) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), as determined by an FDA-approved companion diagnostic test. PATIENTS AND METHODS Approval was based on the results from PROpel, a double-blind trial that randomly assigned 796 patients with mCRPC to abiraterone plus prednisone or prednisolone with either olaparib or placebo. The primary end point was radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) per investigator assessment. RESULTS There was a statistically significant improvement in rPFS for olaparib plus abiraterone versus placebo plus abiraterone, with a median rPFS of 25 versus 17 months and a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.66 (95% CI, 0.54 to 0.81) in the intention-to-treat population. In an exploratory analysis of the subgroup of 85 patients with BRCAm mCRPC, the HR for rPFS was 0.24 (95% CI, 0.12 to 0.45) and the HR for overall survival (OS) was 0.30 (95% CI, 0.15 to 0.59). In an exploratory analysis of the subgroup of 711 patients without an identified BRCA mutation, the HR for rPFS was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.96) and the HR for OS was 0.92 (95% CI, 0.74 to 1.14). Adding olaparib to abiraterone resulted in increased toxicity, including anemia requiring transfusion in 18% of patients. CONCLUSION In patients with mCRPC, efficacy of the combination of olaparib plus abiraterone was primarily attributed to the treatment effect in the BRCAm subgroup, the indicated population for the approval. For patients without BRCAm, the FDA determined that the modest rPFS improvement, combined with clinically significant toxicities, did not demonstrate a favorable risk/benefit assessment.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI