Comparison of Air-charged Catheter and Water-filled Catheter in Female Urethral Pressure Profile

Objective

To compared the maximum urethral pressure (Pura@max) and functional urethral length (FUL) obtained with water-filled catheters and air-charged catheters during female urethral pressure profile (UPP) in a retrospective study.

Patients and Methods

One hundred and five female patients were enrolled in our investigation. At Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, patients who had lower urinary tract dysfunction underwent UPP using a modified UPP equipment. In one UPP, both a water-filled catheter (WFC) and an air-charged catheter (ACC) were employed simultaneously. The paired t test was used to compare the differences between the two systems. Bias and correlations between the two systems were analyzed according to the American Clinical and Laboratory Standardization Institute (CLSI) EP9-A3 recommendations.

Results

There were 105 female participants in this study. The patients were 55.5 ± 14.2years old on average. By using the ACC and WFC systems, the mean FUL was determined to be 39.7 ± 16.2 mm and 33.9 ± 13.9 mm, respectively. The FUL findings of two systems differed significantly from one another (P < .01), and a linear fit with R² = 0.94 indicates a strong linear correlation. The findings of the maximum urethral pressure (Pura@max) measurements made by the ACC and WFC systems, respectively, were 134.3 ± 39.1cmH₂O and 99.2 ± 27.6cmH₂O, are substantially different (P < .01), and the linear fit R² = 0.67. The Pura@max of two systems did not linearly correlate with one another.

Conclusion

For UPP, ACCs often provide higher readings than WFCs, and there is a significant difference in the readings between the two systems. The pressure values derived from the two systems do not correlate, although the FUL does have a significant linear correlation. Results from the ACC and WFC cannot be used interchangeably.