Assessing cachexia in obesity: contradiction or perfectly possible?

减肥 恶病质 肌萎缩性肥胖 肌萎缩 体重不足 肥胖 超重 医学 癌症恶病质 肥胖悖论 体质指数 骨骼肌 分级(工程) 内科学 癌症 土木工程 工程类
作者
Vickie E. Baracos
出处
期刊:Current Opinion in Clinical Nutrition and Metabolic Care [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:27 (5): 387-392 被引量:2
标识
DOI:10.1097/mco.0000000000001054
摘要

Purpose of review Existing definitions of clinically important weight loss in patients with cancer do not specifically address weight loss in patients who are obese at presentation. This review explores the clinical impact of weight loss and depletion of the skeletal muscle mass (i.e., criteria defining cancer cachexia), in patients with obesity. Recent findings Overweight and obese BMI values are shown by many recent studies to pose a survival advantage in patients with cancers of advanced stage, when compared with BMI in normal and underweight ranges. The classification of cancer-associated weight loss has evolved, and current grading schemes evaluate the impact of weight across the range of BMI values. Weight loss is associated with mortality in patients with BMI more than 30 kg/m 2 , however this is to a much lesser degree than in patients with lower BMI values. Diagnostic imaging permits the precise assessment of skeletal muscle index (SMI) in patients with cancer, and it has been clearly shown that while usually quite muscular, obese patients can have profound muscle depletion (i.e., sarcopenia), independent of the presence of weight loss. Muscle depletion associates strongly with mortality in obese patients, as well as with complications of cancer surgery and systemic therapy. Summary It would seem contradictory to diagnose concurrent obesity and cachexia, as these terms represent opposite ends of the weight spectrum. Weight loss can occur in anyone with cancer, however its priority for clinical management may be lesser in obese versus low body weight individuals. Sarcopenic obesity is strongly associated with a poor clinical outcome and deserves further research, diagnosis in clinical practice, and new strategies for mitigation.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
2秒前
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
贝果完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
赘婿应助桃子采纳,获得10
3秒前
LOTUS完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
复杂的尔冬完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
宋真玉完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
执着的以筠完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
健忘洋葱发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
LOTUS发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
6秒前
youzi完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
yo一天完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
生动丸子完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
一枝独秀完成签到 ,获得积分10
8秒前
NingJi应助谦让的中心采纳,获得10
8秒前
周艳鸿发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
ll关注了科研通微信公众号
9秒前
Yuan88发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
不再是纳米的正肽完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
091完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
12秒前
12秒前
13秒前
14秒前
14秒前
桃子发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
上官若男应助可耐的寒凡采纳,获得30
17秒前
赘婿应助Ray旭采纳,获得10
17秒前
十七完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
18秒前
ld发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
Yuan88完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
谢大喵发布了新的文献求助10
19秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Modern Epidemiology, Fourth Edition 5000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Digital Twins of Advanced Materials Processing 2000
Weaponeering, Fourth Edition – Two Volume SET 2000
Social Cognition: Understanding People and Events 1000
Polymorphism and polytypism in crystals 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6030211
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7705005
关于积分的说明 16192383
捐赠科研通 5177165
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2770477
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1753894
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1639389