微泡
外体
聚乙二醇
PEG比率
分离(微生物学)
再生医学
化学
超滤(肾)
色谱法
纳米技术
材料科学
细胞
生物
生物信息学
生物化学
小RNA
基因
财务
经济
作者
Junjun Yu,D. Huang,Hanwen Liu,Haibo Cai
标识
DOI:10.1002/biot.202400374
摘要
ABSTRACT Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)‐derived exosomes, as a cell‐free alternative to MSCs, offer enhanced safety and significant potential in regenerative medicine. However, isolating these exosomes poses a challenge, complicating their broader application. Commonly used methods like ultracentrifugation (UC) and tangential flow filtration are often impractical due to the requirement for costly instruments and ultrafiltration membranes. Additionally, the high cost of commercial kits limits their use in processing large sample volumes. Polyethylene glycol (PEG) precipitation offers a more convenient and cost‐effective alternative, but there is a critical need for optimized and standardized isolation protocols using PEG precipitation across different cell types and fluids to ensure consistent quality and yield. In this work, we optimized the PEG precipitation method for exosomes isolation and compared its effectiveness to two commonly used methods: UC and commercial exosome isolation kits (ExoQuick). The recovery rate of the optimized PEG method (about 61.74%) was comparable to that of the commercial ExoQuick kit (about 62.19%), which was significantly higher than UC (about 45.80%). Exosome cargo analysis validated no significant differences in miRNA and protein profiles associated with the proliferation and migration of exosomes isolated by UC and PEG precipitation, which was confirmed by gap closure and CCK8 assays. These findings suggest that PEG‐based exosomes isolation could be a highly efficient and high‐quality method and may facilitate the development of exosome‐based therapies for regenerative medicine.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI