医学
重症监护医学
背景(考古学)
疾病
败血症
曲菌病
免疫学
内科学
古生物学
生物
作者
Despoina Koulenti,Γεώργιος Παπαθανάκος,Stijn Blot
出处
期刊:Current Opinion in Critical Care
[Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
日期:2023-07-27
卷期号:29 (5): 463-469
被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1097/mcc.0000000000001070
摘要
Purpose of review In the absence of histopathological proof, the diagnosis of invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) is usually based on mycology (not on tissue), medical imaging, and the patient's risk profile for acquiring invasive fungal disease. Here, we review the changes in risk profile for IPA that took place over the past decades. Recent findings In the early 2000s IPA was considered exclusively a disease of immunocompromised patients. Particularly in the context of critical illness, the risk profile has been broadened steadily. Acute viral infection by influenza or SARS-Cov-2 are now well recognized risk factors for IPA. Summary The classic risk profile (‘host factors’) reflecting an immunocompromised status was first enlarged by a spectrum of chronic conditions such as AIDS, cirrhosis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In the presence of critical illness, especially characterized by sepsis and/or severe respiratory distress, any chronic condition could add to the risk profile. Recently, acute viral infections have been associated with IPA leading to the concepts of influenza-associated IPA and COVID-19-associated IPA. These viral infections may affect patients without underlying disease. Hence, the risk for IPA is now a reality for ICU patients, even in the absence of any chronic conditions.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI