NCCN Guideline Concordance Improves Survival in Pediatric and Young Adult Rectal Cancer

医学 指南 一致性 结直肠癌 癌症 年轻人 儿科 内科学 比例危险模型 病理
作者
Colleen Nofi,Sara Siskind,Gary B. Deutsch,John P. Ricci,Aaron M. Lipskar
出处
期刊:Journal of Pediatric Surgery [Elsevier]
卷期号:59 (3): 464-472
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2023.09.042
摘要

Abstract

Background

Although management guidelines in adult rectal cancer are widely studied, no consensus guidelines exist for the management of pediatric and young adult rectal cancer.

Methods

The National Cancer Database (2004–2018) was queried for pediatric (age 0–21) and young adult (age 22–40) patients with rectal cancer. Patients were analyzed for receipt of National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline-concordant therapy. Impact on survival was evaluated using Cox regression and Kaplan–Meier analysis.

Results

6655 patients (108 pediatric and 6547 young adult patients) with rectal cancer were included. Similar to previously published NCCN quality measures with overall guideline concordance approaching 90 % in adults, 89.6 % of pediatric and 84.6 % of young adult patients were classified as receiving pre-operative guideline-concordant therapy. However, pediatric patients were significantly less likely to receive post-operative guideline-concordant therapy than young adult patients (65.3 % verse 76.7 %, respectively, p = 0.008). Risk of death was significantly lower for pediatric patients who received post-operative guideline-concordant therapy (HR, 0.313; CI, 0.168–0.581; p < 0.001). In young adult patients, risk of death was significantly lower for those who received pre-operative guideline-concordant therapy (HR, 0.376, CI 0.338–0.417, p < 0.001), and post-operative guideline-concordant therapy (HR, 0.456; CI 0.413–0.505; p < 0.001).

Discussion

NCCN-based guidelines may reasonably guide peri-operative management decisions and improve survival in pediatric and young adult rectal cancer. Given the rarity of this cancer in young patients, employment of an experienced surgical and oncologic multidisciplinary team, along with discussion and involvement of the patient and family, are keys for balancing risks and benefits to offering the best therapeutic strategy.

Type of study

Retrospective.

Level of evidence

Level III.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
沉默的玻璃猪完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
柯擎汉完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
阳佟雪旋完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
琴power完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
Science完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
内向的涵菡完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
Dante应助梧州雨采纳,获得10
4秒前
爆米花应助威武荟采纳,获得10
5秒前
小二郎应助傅傅采纳,获得10
6秒前
充电宝应助断奉采纳,获得10
6秒前
学术蝗虫完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
6秒前
天天快乐应助SSS采纳,获得10
6秒前
4149发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
QXS完成签到 ,获得积分10
7秒前
爱啥啥完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助THEFAN采纳,获得10
8秒前
打打应助YANYAN采纳,获得10
9秒前
LG关闭了LG文献求助
10秒前
赘婿应助NIU采纳,获得10
10秒前
YooM发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
yuliuism发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
11秒前
叮叮车完成签到,获得积分10
11秒前
爱啥啥发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
个性若冰发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
12秒前
顾矜应助安世倌采纳,获得10
12秒前
z_king_d_23发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
14秒前
叮叮车发布了新的文献求助20
15秒前
桐桐应助研友_8QxayZ采纳,获得10
17秒前
情怀应助4149采纳,获得10
17秒前
xiaolei001发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
丘比特应助王小花采纳,获得10
18秒前
断奉发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Forensic and Legal Medicine Third Edition 5000
Introduction to strong mixing conditions volume 1-3 5000
Agyptische Geschichte der 21.30. Dynastie 3000
Aerospace Engineering Education During the First Century of Flight 2000
„Semitische Wissenschaften“? 1510
从k到英国情人 1500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5769630
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5580702
关于积分的说明 15422304
捐赠科研通 4903300
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2638156
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1586055
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1541154