Wavefront Optimized Versus Custom-Q Treatments in Surface Ablation for Myopic Astigmatism With the WaveLight ALLEGRETTO Laser

烧蚀 散光 屈光度 波前 医学 眼睛畸变 视力 眼科 对比度(视觉) 外科 光学 物理 内科学
出处
期刊:Journal of Refractive Surgery [Slack Incorporated (United States)]
卷期号:24 (8): 779-789 被引量:29
标识
DOI:10.3928/1081597x-20081001-03
摘要

<h4>PURPOSE</h4><p>To compare treatments with wavefront optimized and custom-Q ablations.</p> <h4>METHODS</h4><p>Two consecutive groups of eyes were treated for myopia and astigmatism with surface ablation. One group was treated with wavefront optimized ablation and the second group was treated with custom-Q ablation. Preoperative and 3-month postoperative Q-values, higher order aberrations, low contrast visual acuity, and classic outcome parameters were analyzed.</p> <h4>RESULTS</h4><p>The wavefront optimized ablation group was comprised of 46 eyes of 23 patients with a mean spherical equivalent refraction (SE) of –3.64 diopters (D) (range: –1.15 to –8.25 D); mean Q-value changed from –0.33 preoperatively to 0.06 postoperatively. The custom-Q ablation group was comprised of 42 eyes of 21 patients with a mean SE of –3.24 D (range: –1.47 to –8.00 D); mean Q-value changed from –0.36 preoperatively to –0.03 postoperatively. A statistically significant difference in postoperative change in Q-values (<i>P</i>=.049) between the two groups was noted, but there was no such difference in higher order aberrations, low contrast visual acuity, or classic outcome parameters.</p> <h4>CONCLUSIONS</h4><p>Custom-Q ablation resulted in a mean postoperative asphericity that was closer to preoperative compared to wavefront optimized ablation, whereas the other outcome parameters showed no statistically significant differences. [<cite>J Refract Surg.</cite> 2008;24:779-789.]</p> <h4>ABOUT THE AUTHORS</h4> <p>From the Eye Department, University Hospital of North Norway and SynsLaser Kirurgi, Tomsø, Norway (Stojanovic); School of Ophthalmology and Optometry and Eye Hospital, Wenzhou Medical College, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China (L. Wang, Q. Wang); Milos Klinika, Medical Academy – US Medical School, Belgrade, Serbia (Jankov); and Øyelegesenteret, Tomsø, Norway (Nitter).</p> <p>This study was supported by SynsLaser Kirurgi, Tomsø, Norway.</p> <p>Dr Jankov is a paid consultant for WaveLight AG, Erlangen, Germany. The remaining authors have no proprietary or financial interest in the materials presented herein.</p> <p>Correspondence: Aleksandar Stojanovic, MD, Fløyvn 32, 9020 Tromsdalen, Norway. Tel: 47 90693319; Fax: 47 77647929; E-mail: <a href="mailto:aleks@online.no">aleks@online.no</a></p> <p>Received: February 26, 2007</p> <p>Accepted: November 7, 2007</p> <p><b>Posted online: March 15, 2008</b></p>

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
思途问径发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
酥酥脆发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
学术裁缝完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
海洋球发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
嗯嗯发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
chenling完成签到,获得积分20
3秒前
3秒前
危机的桐完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
4秒前
千山暮雪发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
liao应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
4秒前
4秒前
4秒前
脑洞疼应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
4秒前
泥泞发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
4秒前
5秒前
传奇3应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
Orange应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
发发旦旦发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
顾矜应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
赘婿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
来块德芙完成签到,获得积分20
5秒前
沙瑞金发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
5秒前
无花果应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
5秒前
隐形曼青应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
ding应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
6秒前
6秒前
JM完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Handbook of pharmaceutical excipients, Ninth edition 5000
Aerospace Standards Index - 2026 ASIN2026 3000
Signals, Systems, and Signal Processing 610
Discrete-Time Signals and Systems 610
Principles of town planning : translating concepts to applications 500
Modified letrozole versus GnRH antagonist protocols in ovarian aging women for IVF: An Open-Label, Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial 360
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 纳米技术 有机化学 物理 生物化学 化学工程 计算机科学 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 光电子学 物理化学 电极 冶金 遗传学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6061874
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7894103
关于积分的说明 16308376
捐赠科研通 5205564
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2784922
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1767457
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1647407