The National Database of Nursing Quality Indicators(TM) (NDNQI

护理部 人员配备 操作化 护理结果分类 医疗保健 质量(理念) 医学 护理 护士教育 单位(环理论) 护理最小数据集 初级护理 心理学 政治学 哲学 数学教育 认识论 法学
作者
Isis Montalvo
出处
期刊:The online journal of issues in nursing 卷期号:12 (3) 被引量:64
摘要

Abstract National Database of Nursing Quality IndicatorsTM is the only national nursing database that provides quarterly and annual reporting of structure, process, and outcome indicators to evaluate nursing care at the unit level. Linkages between nurse staffing levels and patient outcomes have already been demonstrated through the use of this database. Currently over 1100 facilities in the United States contribute to this growing database which can now be used to show the economic implications of various levels of nurse staffing. purpose of this article is to describe the work and accomplishments related to the NDNQI as researchers utilize its nursing-sensitive outcomes measures to demonstrate the value of nurses in promoting quality patient care. After reviewing the history of evaluating nursing care quality, this article will explain the purpose of the NDNQI and describe how the database has been operationalized. Accomplishments and future plans of the NDNQI will also be discussed. Citation: Montalvo, I., (September 30, 2007) The National Database of Nursing Quality IndicatorsTM (NDNQI®) OJIN: Online Journal of Issues in Nursing. Vol. 12 No. 3, Manuscript 2. Available: www.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Volume122007/No3Sept07/NursingQualityIndicators.aspx Key Words: nursing-sensitive indicators, quality, nurse staffing, patient outcomes, nursing outcomes, performance measurement Quality is a broad term that encompasses various aspects of nursing care. Various health care measures have been identified over the years as indicators of health care quality (American Nurses Association, 1995; Institute of Medicine, 1999, 2001, 2005; Joint Commission, 2007). In 2004, the National Quality Forum (NQF), via its voluntary consensus standards process, endorsed 15 national standards to be used in evaluating nursing-sensitive care. These standards are now known as the NQF 15 (Kurtzman & Corrigan, 2007). purpose of this article is to describe the work and accomplishments related to the National Database of Nursing Quality IndicatorsTM as researchers utilize its nursing-sensitive outcomes measures to demonstrate the value of nurses in promoting quality patient care. After reviewing the history of evaluating nursing care quality, this article will explain the purpose of the NDNQI and describe how the database has been operationalized. Accomplishments and future plans of the NDNQI will also be discussed. History of Evaluating Nursing Care Quality Evaluating the quality of nursing practice began when Florence Nightingale identified nursing's role in health care quality and began to measure patient outcomes. She used statistical methods to generate reports correlating patient outcomes to environmental conditions (Dossey, 2005; Nightingale, 1859/1946). Over the years, quality measurement in health care has evolved. work done in the 1970s by the American Nurses Association (ANA), the wide dissemination of the Quality Assurance (QA) model (Rantz, 1995), and the introduction of Donabedian's structure, process, and outcomes model (Donabedian, 1988, 1992) have offered a comprehensive method for evaluating health care quality. workforce restructuring and redesign prevalent in the early 1990s demonstrated the need for the ANA to evaluate nurse staffing and identify linkages between nurse staffing and patient outcomes. In 1994 the ANA Board of Directors asked ANA staff to investigate the impact of these changes on the safety and quality of patient care. In 1994, ANA launched the Patient Safety and Quality Initiative (ANA, 1995). A series of pilot studies across the United States were funded by ANA to evaluate linkages between nurse staffing and quality of care (ANA, 1996a, 1997, 2000a, 2000b, 2000c). Multiple quality indicators were identified initially. Evidence of the effectiveness of these indicators was used to adopt a final set of 10 nursing-sensitive indicators to use in evaluating patient care quality (Gallagher & Rowell, 2003). …

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
刚刚
1秒前
嗯哼应助wang采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
followZ完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
刘松发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
科研通AI2S应助清城采纳,获得10
4秒前
4秒前
胡33完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
FashionBoy应助www采纳,获得10
4秒前
梁晞完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
吉祥应助sasa采纳,获得30
5秒前
香蕉觅云应助sasa采纳,获得10
5秒前
陌上疏完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
6秒前
Lucas应助白鹭立雪采纳,获得10
6秒前
小马甲应助高木同学采纳,获得10
6秒前
rayce完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
7秒前
wawa完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
ask完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
胡33发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
wang完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
王小磊发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
xy完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
YUYUYU完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
大个应助秀丽的千山采纳,获得30
10秒前
ZZ完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
乐乐应助一个小胖子采纳,获得10
10秒前
王饱饱完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
11秒前
zxh123发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
DCW完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
无名完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
梁晞发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
13秒前
停摆的指针应助sweat采纳,获得10
13秒前
14秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in ’Tides Chemistry 2000
Studien zur Ideengeschichte der Gesetzgebung 1000
The ACS Guide to Scholarly Communication 1000
TM 5-855-1(Fundamentals of protective design for conventional weapons) 1000
Handbook of the Mammals of the World – Volume 3: Primates 805
Ethnicities: Media, Health, and Coping 800
Gerard de Lairesse : an artist between stage and studio 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3072929
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2726563
关于积分的说明 7495633
捐赠科研通 2374613
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1259073
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 610527
版权声明 597020