多奈哌齐
竞争对手
加兰他明
医学
安慰剂
荟萃分析
不利影响
科克伦图书馆
随机对照试验
药理学
临床试验
内科学
痴呆
疾病
替代医学
病理
作者
Richard A Hansen,Gerald Gartlehner,Aaron P. Webb,Laura C Morgan,Charity G. Moore,Daniel E Jonas
出处
期刊:PubMed
日期:2008-01-01
卷期号:3 (2): 211-25
被引量:302
摘要
Pharmacologic treatments for Alzheimer's disease include the cholinesterase inhibitors donepezil, galantamine, and rivastigmine. We reviewed their evidence by searching MEDLINE, Embase, The Cochrane Library, and the International Pharmaceutical Abstracts from 1980 through 2007 (July) for placebo-controlled and comparative trials assessing cognition, function, behavior, global change, and safety. Thirty-three articles on 26 studies were included in the review. Meta-analyses of placebo-controlled data support the drugs' modest overall benefits for stabilizing or slowing decline in cognition, function, behavior, and clinical global change. Three open-label trials and one double-blind randomized trial directly compared donepezil with galantamine and rivastigmine. Results are conflicting; two studies suggest no differences in efficacy between compared drugs, while one study found donepezil to be more efficacious than galantamine, and one study found rivastigmine to be more efficacious than donepezil. Adjusted indirect comparison of placebo-controlled data did not find statistically significant differences among drugs with regard to cognition, but found the relative risk of global response to be better with donepezil and rivastigmine compared with galantamine (relative risk = 1.63 and 1.42, respectively). Indirect comparisons also favored donepezil over galantamine with regard to behavior. Across trials, the incidence of adverse events was generally lowest for donepezil and highest for rivastigmine.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI