Evaluations of the uptake and impact of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement and extensions: a scoping review

系统回顾 医学 梅德林 语句(逻辑) 指南 荟萃分析 家庭医学 病理 政治学 法学
作者
Matthew J. Page,David Moher
出处
期刊:Systematic Reviews [Springer Nature]
卷期号:6 (1) 被引量:473
标识
DOI:10.1186/s13643-017-0663-8
摘要

The PRISMA Statement is a reporting guideline designed to improve transparency of systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses. Seven extensions to the PRISMA Statement have been published to address the reporting of different types or aspects of SRs, and another eight are in development. We performed a scoping review to map the research that has been conducted to evaluate the uptake and impact of the PRISMA Statement and extensions. We also synthesised studies evaluating how well SRs published after the PRISMA Statement was disseminated adhere to its recommendations.We searched for meta-research studies indexed in MEDLINE® from inception to 31 July 2017, which investigated some component of the PRISMA Statement or extensions (e.g. SR adherence to PRISMA, journal endorsement of PRISMA). One author screened all records and classified the types of evidence available in the studies. We pooled data on SR adherence to individual PRISMA items across all SRs in the included studies and across SRs published after 2009 (the year PRISMA was disseminated).We included 100 meta-research studies. The most common type of evidence available was data on SR adherence to the PRISMA Statement, which has been evaluated in 57 studies that have assessed 6487 SRs. The pooled results of these studies suggest that reporting of many items in the PRISMA Statement is suboptimal, even in the 2382 SRs published after 2009 (where nine items were adhered to by fewer than 67% of SRs). Few meta-research studies have evaluated the adherence of SRs to the PRISMA extensions or strategies to increase adherence to the PRISMA Statement and extensions.Many studies have evaluated how well SRs adhere to the PRISMA Statement, and the pooled result of these suggest that reporting of many items is suboptimal. An update of the PRISMA Statement, along with a toolkit of strategies to help journals endorse and implement the updated guideline, may improve the transparency of SRs.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
大幅提高文件上传限制,最高150M (2024-4-1)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
蓝色的鱼发布了新的文献求助10
1秒前
充电宝应助怡然嚣采纳,获得10
1秒前
wanci应助都是采纳,获得10
1秒前
2秒前
紫苑发布了新的文献求助20
3秒前
盛夏发布了新的文献求助10
4秒前
ZWZ发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
故渊完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
独特的寇发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
c仔叻发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
狸狸完成签到,获得积分20
8秒前
吴ml发布了新的文献求助30
9秒前
DullElm发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
脑洞疼应助nini采纳,获得20
10秒前
10秒前
10秒前
高高梦山完成签到 ,获得积分10
10秒前
ZWZ完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
11秒前
陶渊明完成签到,获得积分0
11秒前
12秒前
wanci应助胡蝶采纳,获得10
12秒前
专注的发带完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
13秒前
夏虫发布了新的文献求助10
13秒前
Owen应助vv的平行宇宙采纳,获得30
14秒前
14秒前
14秒前
15秒前
坚强的寒蕾关注了科研通微信公众号
15秒前
15秒前
dusk发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
CL发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
16秒前
陶渊明发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
17秒前
昨天发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
bingbingnan发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
闫究生完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
高分求助中
Sustainability in Tides Chemistry 2000
Bayesian Models of Cognition:Reverse Engineering the Mind 800
A Dissection Guide & Atlas to the Rabbit 600
Very-high-order BVD Schemes Using β-variable THINC Method 568
Внешняя политика КНР: о сущности внешнеполитического курса современного китайского руководства 500
Revolution und Konterrevolution in China [by A. Losowsky] 500
Manual of Sewer Condition Classification 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 医学 生物 材料科学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 催化作用 物理化学 免疫学 量子力学 细胞生物学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3123390
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 2773951
关于积分的说明 7720148
捐赠科研通 2429656
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1290409
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 621833
版权声明 600251