银耳霉素
杜瓦卢马布
肝细胞癌
危险系数
索拉非尼
医学
置信区间
肿瘤科
养生
内科学
泌尿科
外科
癌症
免疫疗法
无容量
易普利姆玛
作者
Ghassan K. Abou‐Alfa,George Lau,Masatoshi Kudo,Stephen L. Chan,Robin Kate Kelley,Junji Furuse,Wattana Sukeepaisarnjaroen,Yoon‐Koo Kang,Tu Van Dao,Enrico N. De Toni,Lorenza Rimassa,В. В. Бредер,Alexander Vasilyev,Alexandra Heurgué,Vincent C. Tam,Kabir Mody,Satheesh Chiradoni Thungappa,Yuriy Ostapenko,Thomas Yau,Sérgio Jobim Azevedo,Marı́a Varela,Ann‐Lii Cheng,Shukui Qin,Peter R. Galle,Saqib Ali,Michelle Marcovitz,Mallory Makowsky,Philip He,John F. Kurland,Alejandra Negro,Bruno Sangro
出处
期刊:NEJM evidence
[New England Journal of Medicine]
日期:2022-06-06
卷期号:1 (8)
被引量:610
标识
DOI:10.1056/evidoa2100070
摘要
BackgroundA single, high priming dose of tremelimumab (anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte–associated antigen 4) plus durvalumab (anti–programmed cell death ligand-1), an infusion regimen termed STRIDE (Single Tremelimumab Regular Interval Durvalumab), showed encouraging clinical activity and safety in a phase 2 trial of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.MethodsIn this global, open-label, phase 3 trial, the majority of the patients we enrolled with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma and no previous systemic treatment were randomly assigned to receive one of three regimens: tremelimumab (300 mg, one dose) plus durvalumab (1500 mg every 4 weeks; STRIDE), durvalumab (1500 mg every 4 weeks), or sorafenib (400 mg twice daily). The primary objective was overall survival for STRIDE versus sorafenib. Noninferiority for overall survival for durvalumab versus sorafenib was a secondary objective.ResultsIn total, 1171 patients were randomly assigned to STRIDE (n=393), durvalumab (n=389), or sorafenib (n=389). The median overall survival was 16.43 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.16 to 19.58) with STRIDE, 16.56 months (95% CI, 14.06 to 19.12) with durvalumab, and 13.77 months (95% CI, 12.25 to 16.13) with sorafenib. Overall survival at 36 months was 30.7%, 24.7%, and 20.2%, respectively. The overall survival hazard ratio for STRIDE versus sorafenib was 0.78 (96.02% CI, 0.65 to 0.93; P=0.0035). Overall survival with durvalumab monotherapy was noninferior to sorafenib (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95.67% CI, 0.73 to 1.03; noninferiority margin, 1.08). Median progression-free survival was not significantly different among all three groups. Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred for 50.5% of patients with STRIDE, 37.1% with durvalumab, and 52.4% with sorafenib.ConclusionsSTRIDE significantly improved overall survival versus sorafenib. Durvalumab monotherapy was noninferior to sorafenib for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. (Funded by AstraZeneca; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03298451.)