中国
背景(考古学)
业务
印度尼西亚语
首都(建筑)
工业园区
政府(语言学)
经济
资源(消歧)
经济
政治学
古生物学
法学
考古
哲学
历史
生物
语言学
计算机科学
计算机网络
作者
Alvin Camba,Guanie Lim,Kevin P. Gallagher
标识
DOI:10.1080/01436597.2022.2093180
摘要
How do states pursue industrial policies in the context of China’s rise? Examining Indonesia and Malaysia’s mineral processing sectors, we argue that these countries illustrate two different pathways that states take to bolster their industrial policies. Indonesia has followed the leading sector strategy to increase domestic nickel processing capacity and decrease reliance on resource exports. Chinese firms and the Indonesian government built the Indonesia Morowali Industrial Park to house nickel smelters, fostering a new leading sector. Chinese capital in smelting follows what Albert Hirschman has called ‘intermediate investments’, maximising forward and backward linkages across the Indonesian economy. In contrast, Malaysia has followed the dual economy strategy, where semi-finished goods are imported and assembled into finished ones to be exported abroad. Chinese firms and the Malaysian government established the Malaysia–China Kuantan Industrial Park to import, process and export steel products. However, due to the dual economy strategy, the industrial park impairs the activities of domestic steelmaking companies and inhibits the potential build-up of smelting capacity. In sum, through an examination of an industrial park in each country, our paper connects the literatures on industrial policy and Chinese capital.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI