物理疗法
医学
随机对照试验
心理干预
干预(咨询)
健康心理学
乳腺癌
焦虑
睡眠障碍
临床心理学
认知
精神科
癌症
公共卫生
内科学
护理部
作者
Payton Solk,Jing Song,Whitney A. Welch,Bonnie Spring,David Cella,Frank J. Penedo,Ron Ackermann,Kerry S. Courneya,Juned Siddique,Hannah Freeman,Julia Starikovsky,Abby Mishory,Jacqueline Alexander,Melanie Wolter,Lillian Carden,Siobhan M. Phillips
摘要
Abstract Background Moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) interventions improve patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of physical and psychological health among breast cancer survivors (BCS); however, the effects of specific intervention components on PROs are unknown. Purpose To use the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) to examine overall effects of the Fit2Thrive MVPA promotion intervention on PROs in BCS and explore whether there are intervention component-specific effects on PROs. Methods Physically inactive BCS [n = 269; Mage = 52.5 (SD = 9.9)] received a core intervention (Fitbit + Fit2Thrive smartphone app) and were randomly assigned to one of 32 conditions in a full factorial experiment of five components (“on” vs. “off”): (i) support calls, (ii) deluxe app, (iii) text messages, (iv) online gym, and (v) buddy. Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) questionnaires assessed anxiety, depression, fatigue, physical functioning, sleep disturbance and sleep-related impairment at baseline, post-intervention (12-week), and 24-week follow-up. Main effects for all components at each time point were examined using an intention to treat mixed-effects model. Results All PROMIS measures except sleep disturbance significantly improved (p’s < .008 for all) from baseline to 12-weeks. Effects were maintained at 24-weeks. The “on” level of each component did not result in significantly greater improvements on any PROMIS measure compared to the “off” level. Conclusions Participation in Fit2Thrive was associated with improved PROs in BCS, but improvements did not differ for “on” vs. “off” levels for any component tested. The low-resource Fit2Thrive core intervention is a potential strategy to improve PROs among BCS. Future studies should test the core in an RCT and examine various intervention component effects in BCS with clinically elevated PROs.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI