Molecular Profiles of Noninvasive, Minimally Invasive, and Invasive Follicular Patterned Thyroid Neoplasms with Papillary Nuclear Features

Background: An increasing amount of data is being published, which risk-stratify thyroid tumors according to genetic signatures and histological morphology. Typically, follicular patterned lesions have been shown to harbor RAS-like mutations with more indolent behaviors. Our study aims to examine the extent of similarity among three groups of follicular patterned lesions with papillary nuclear features—noninvasive follicular thyroid neoplasm with papillary-like nuclear features (NIFTP), encapsulated follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (EFVPTC) with capsular invasion and/or angioinvasion, and infiltrative follicular variant of papillary thyroid carcinoma (iFVPTC)—to help clarify whether NIFTP and EFVPTC represent a histological continuum and the degree to which the genomic landscape further separates higher risk follicular patterned tumors such as iFVPTC from more indolent ones (EFVPTC and NIFTP). Methods: ThyroSeq test results were compared for cases with histological NIFTP, EFVPTC, and iFVPTC in this retrospective study. Genetic drivers were subcategorized by level of aggressiveness. Gene expression alterations (GEAs) and copy number alterations (CNAs) were compared among the three histological groups. Results: NIFTP and EFVPTC cases displayed predominantly RAS-like alterations (100% and 75%, respectively) and RAS-like GEAs (55.2% and 47.2%, respectively), and many showed CNAs with 22q-loss. Despite a predominance of RAS-like alterations, EFVPTC cases showed molecular heterogeneity with significantly more intermediate and aggressive drivers (22.3% of cases) than NIFTP (0%) (p = 0.0068). iFVPTC cases displayed molecular profiles in between that of traditional follicular patterned lesions and classical papillary thyroid carcinoma, predominantly displaying intermediate and aggressive drivers (61.6%), which was significantly higher than that of EFVPTC (22.3%, p = 0.0158) and NIFTP (0%, p < 0.0001), illustrating the higher MAP kinase activity of iFVPTC. There was no significant difference, however, in comparing GEAs among the three histological groups. Conclusions: While follicular patterned lesions with papillary nuclear features overall tend to display RAS-like alterations, EFVPTC cases, followed by iFVPTC in this series, showed increasing proportions of more aggressive drivers. EFVPTC and NIFTP show much molecular overlap, with predominance of RAS-like alterations, suggesting that these tumors are part of a genetic continuum, while still ranked differentially. Preoperative molecular testing can potentially distinguish EFVPTC and iFVTPC from NIFTP based on a particular molecular signature, optimizing patient management.