检查表
系统回顾
肌萎缩
荟萃分析
医学
数据提取
批判性评价
观察研究
置信区间
风险评估
预测建模
梅德林
重症监护医学
内科学
统计
病理
心理学
计算机科学
替代医学
计算机安全
数学
政治学
法学
认知心理学
作者
Qing Yang,Wenting Ji,Julan Guo,Han Fu,Hang Li,Jing Gao,Chaoming Hou
摘要
The number of risk prediction models for sarcopenia in patients undergoing maintenance haemodialysis (MHD) is increasing. However, the quality, applicability, and reporting adherence of these models in clinical practice and future research remain unknown. To systematically review published studies on risk prediction models for sarcopenia in patients undergoing MHD. Systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. This systematic review adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. Search relevant domestic and international databases, which were searched from the inception of the databases until November 2023. The Critical Appraisal and Data Extraction for Systematic Reviews of Prediction Modelling Studies (CHARMS) checklist was used to extract data. The Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) checklist was used to assess the risk of bias and applicability. The Transparent Reporting of a Multivariate Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) was used to assess the reporting adherence. A total of 478 articles were retrieved, and 12 prediction models from 11 articles were included after the screening process. The incidence of sarcopenia in patients undergoing MHD was 16.38%-37.29%. The reported area under the curve (AUC) ranged from 0.73 to 0.955. All studies had a high risk of bias, mainly because of inappropriate data sources and poor reporting in the field of analysis. The combined AUC value of the six validation models was 0.91 (95% confidence interval: 0.87-0.94), indicating that the model had a high discrimination. Although the included studies reported to some extent the discrimination of predictive models for sarcopenia in patients undergoing MHD, all studies were assessed to have a high risk of bias according to the PROBAST checklist, following the reporting guidelines outlined in the TRIPOD statement, and adherence was incomplete in all studies. CRD42023476067.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI