Inconsistent consistency: evaluating the well-defined intervention assumption in applied epidemiological research

流行病学 一致性(知识库) 医学 干预(咨询) 环境卫生 统计 数学 病理 精神科 几何学
作者
Jerzy Eisenberg‐Guyot,Katrina Kezios,Seth J. Prins,Sharon Schwartz
出处
期刊:International Journal of Epidemiology [Oxford University Press]
卷期号:54 (2)
标识
DOI:10.1093/ije/dyaf015
摘要

According to textbook guidance, satisfying the well-defined intervention assumption is key for estimating causal effects. However, no studies have systematically evaluated how the assumption is addressed in research. Thus, we reviewed how researchers using g-methods or targeted maximum likelihood estimation (TMLE) interpreted and addressed the well-defined intervention assumption in epidemiological studies. We reviewed observational epidemiological studies that used g-methods or TMLE, were published from 2000-21 in epidemiology journals with the six highest 2020 impact factors and met additional criteria. Among other factors, reviewers assessed if authors of included studies aimed to estimate the effects of hypothetical interventions. Then, among such studies, reviewers assessed whether authors discussed key causal-inference assumptions (e.g. consistency or treatment variation irrelevance), how they interpreted their findings and if they specified well-defined interventions. Just 20% (29/146) of studies aimed to estimate the effects of hypothetical interventions. Of such intervention-effect studies, almost none (1/29) stated 'how' the exposure would be intervened upon; among those that did not state a 'how', the 'how' mattered for consistency (i.e., for treatment variation irrelevance) in 64% of studies (18/28). Moreover, whereas 79% (23/29) of intervention-effect studies mentioned consistency, just 45% (13/29) interpreted findings as corresponding to the effects of hypothetical interventions. Finally, reviewers determined that just 38% (11/29) of intervention-effect studies had well-defined interventions. We found substantial deviations between guidelines regarding meeting the well-defined intervention assumption and researchers' application of the guidelines, with authors of intervention-effect studies rarely critically examining the assumption's validity, let alone specifying well-defined interventions.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
bkagyin应助zzzz采纳,获得10
刚刚
皮皮完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
3秒前
5秒前
HR112应助大气乐儿采纳,获得10
5秒前
J.发布了新的文献求助20
8秒前
慕青应助wjwless采纳,获得10
12秒前
直击灵魂完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
18秒前
LYZH完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
Kyrie完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
23秒前
细腻的雅山完成签到,获得积分10
28秒前
28秒前
Reborn应助七七采纳,获得10
28秒前
28秒前
接accept完成签到 ,获得积分10
29秒前
29秒前
大气的萃完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
课题分离发布了新的文献求助30
32秒前
顺顺利利毕业完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
jason发布了新的文献求助10
34秒前
淡定娩完成签到,获得积分10
35秒前
36秒前
挺喜欢你发布了新的文献求助10
42秒前
Hmbb发布了新的文献求助10
43秒前
慕青应助王是SCI2采纳,获得10
43秒前
严不平发布了新的文献求助20
47秒前
pxy完成签到,获得积分10
47秒前
49秒前
wanci应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
51秒前
51秒前
思源应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
51秒前
wanci应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
51秒前
随遇而安应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
51秒前
李健应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
51秒前
斯文败类应助科研通管家采纳,获得200
51秒前
熊生魔导士应助明理鸵鸟采纳,获得10
53秒前
53秒前
高分求助中
All the Birds of the World 3000
Weirder than Sci-fi: Speculative Practice in Art and Finance 960
IZELTABART TAPATANSINE 500
Introduction to Comparative Public Administration: Administrative Systems and Reforms in Europe: Second Edition 2nd Edition 300
Spontaneous closure of a dural arteriovenous malformation 300
GNSS Applications in Earth and Space Observations 300
Not Equal : Towards an International Law of Finance 260
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3722418
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3268216
关于积分的说明 9953901
捐赠科研通 2982476
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1635981
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 776745
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 746569