自闭症谱系障碍
接收机工作特性
孤独症诊断观察量表
脑电图
曲线下面积
听力学
自闭症
曲线下面积
眼动
心理学
医学
人工智能
神经科学
计算机科学
内科学
发展心理学
药代动力学
作者
Binbin Sun,Bryan Wang,Zhen Wei,Zhe Feng,Zhi-Liu Wu,Walid Yassin,William S. Stone,Yan Lin,Xuejun Kong
标识
DOI:10.3389/fnins.2023.1236637
摘要
Electroencephalography (EEG) functional connectivity (EFC) and eye tracking (ET) have been explored as objective screening methods for autism spectrum disorder (ASD), but no study has yet evaluated restricted and repetitive behavior (RRBs) simultaneously to infer early ASD diagnosis. Typically developing (TD) children ( n = 27) and ASD ( n = 32), age- and sex-matched, were evaluated with EFC and ET simultaneously, using the restricted interest stimulus paradigm. Network-based machine learning prediction (NBS-predict) was used to identify ASD. Correlations between EFC, ET, and Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule-Second Edition (ADOS-2) were performed. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) of receiver-operating characteristics (ROC) was measured to evaluate the predictive performance. Under high restrictive interest stimuli (HRIS), ASD children have significantly higher α band connectivity and significantly more total fixation time (TFT)/pupil enlargement of ET relative to TD children ( p = 0.04299). These biomarkers were not only significantly positively correlated with each other (R = 0.716, p = 8.26e−4), but also with ADOS total scores (R = 0.749, p = 34e-4) and RRBs sub-score (R = 0.770, p = 1.87e-4) for EFC (R = 0.641, p = 0.0148) for TFT. The accuracy of NBS-predict in identifying ASD was 63.4%. ROC curve demonstrated TFT with 91 and 90% sensitivity, and 78.7% and 77.4% specificity for ADOS total and RRB sub-scores, respectively. Simultaneous EFC and ET evaluation in ASD is highly correlated with RRB symptoms measured by ADOS-2. NBS-predict of EFC offered a direct prediction of ASD. The use of both EFC and ET improve early ASD diagnosis.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI