作者
Ameer E. Hassan,Michael Abraham,Spiros Blackburn,Muhammad Shazam Hussain,Mahmoud Dibas,Michael Chen,Yin Hu,Deep Pujara,Nabeel Herial,Jenny Tsai,Ronald F. Budzik,Nathan Manning,Osman Kozak,Ricardó A. Hanel,Amin N. Aghaebrahim,Chirag D. Gandhi,Fawaz Al‐Mufti,Andrew Cheung,Bernard Yan,Peter Mitchell,Jordi Blasco,Luís San Román,Nirav Vora,Daniel J. Gibson,Adam N. Wallace,Daniel Sahlein,Lucas Elijovich,Juan F. Arenillas,Teddy Y. Wu,Père-Joan Cardona,Natàlia Pérez de la Ossa,Joanna D. Schaafsma,William J. Hicks,Dennis Cordato,Navdeep Sangha,Steven Warach,Timothy Kleinig,Faris Shaker,Hannah Johns,Wondwossen Tekle,Mark Dannenbaum,Koji Ebersole,Gábor Tóth,M. Reid Gooch,Abdulnasser Alhajeri,Krishna Amuluru,Abhishek Ray,Jan‐Karl Burkhardt,Mohammad A Abdulrazzak,David Rosenbaum-Halevi,Haris Kamal,Kelsey Duncan,Clark Sitton,Leonid P. Churilov,Vítor Mendes Pereira,Jeffrey L. Sunshine,Thanh N. Nguyen,Johanna T. Fifi,Edgar A. Samaniego,Adam S Arthur,Stavropoula Tjoumakaris,Pascal Jabbour,Stephen M. Davis,Lawrence R. Wechsler,Nicholas C. Bambakidis,Scott E. Kasner,James C. Grotta,Michael D. Hill,Bruce Campbell,Marc Ribó,Amrou Sarraj
摘要
Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) was shown to be safe and efficacious in patients with large core stroke in multiple randomized controlled trials. However, the impact of reperfusion and other procedural metrics on EVT outcomes in this population has not been well‐characterized. Methods From the SELECT2 trial, we evaluated the association between reperfusion status, first‐pass effect (near‐complete or complete reperfusion [extended thrombolysis in cerebral infarction (eTICI) 2c‐3] in 1 pass), procedure time and primary technique (aspiration vs stent‐retriever) with functional outcomes in patients receiving EVT across ASPECTS (3 vs 4 vs 5) and core estimate strata (<70 vs ≥70ml, <100 vs ≥100ml, and <150 vs ≥150ml). Results Of 180 patients who received thrombectomy, 144 (80%) achieved successful reperfusion (eTICI 2b‐3) and demonstrated better clinical outcomes (adjusted generalized odds ratios [aGenOR]: 1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01–2.15), compared with unsuccessful reperfusion. Results were consistent across ASPECTS and core estimate strata. Additionally, complete or near‐complete reperfusion (eTICI 2c‐3) was associated with better functional outcome (aGenOR: 1.99, 95% CI: 1.33–2.97) in patients achieving successful reperfusion. Functional outcome point estimates favored those with first‐pass‐effect (42 of 167 (25%), aGenOR: 1.46, 95% CI: 0.96–2.24). Longer procedure time was associated with worse modified Rankin scale (mRS) distribution (aGenOR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.87–0.96, p ‐value = 0.001 for 10 minutes increment). Aspiration‐first technique was used in 43 of 154 (25%) patients and was not associated with higher reperfusion (88% vs 78%, p = 0.18) or better functional outcome (aGenOR: 0.74, 95% CI: 0.50–1.10) as compared with stent‐retriever first. Interpretation Successful reperfusion resulted in improved clinical outcomes in large core patients across baseline ischemic core strata. Near complete or complete reperfusion was further associated with better outcomes, whereas prolonged procedures were associated with worse outcomes. Results were consistent regardless of the technique used. ANN NEUROL 2024