Investigation of efficacy and acquired resistance for EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment in patients with EGFR sensitive mutant non-small cell lung cancer in a Real world population

Objectives We aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy of EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI, T) plus bevacizumab (an antiangiogenic therapy, A) in a real-world population and to provide insights into their mechanism of resistance. Methods This study included 256 NSCLC patients harboring EGFR sensitizing mutations (EGFR 19del and L858R) who underwent nextgeneration sequencing (NGS) with 168-gene panel prior to treatment between Jan 2015 to Aug 2018. Cohort A included 60 patients treated with A + T; while cohort B consisted of 120 patients treated with EGFR-TKI monotherapy with the patients identified using Propensity Score Matching (Ratio of 1:2). Clinical outcomes and potential resistance mechanism were evaluated. Results Baseline clinical characteristics were not significantly different between Cohort A and B. Compared with cohort B, cohort A had significantly better overall response rate (95% vs 74.2%, p = 0.001) and longer median progression-free survival (PFS, 16.5m vs.12.0 m, HR = 0.7, p = 0.001). Until Jan 2019, 31 and 103 patients in cohort A and B, respectively, were evaluated with progressive disease and underwent tissue re-biopsy and NGS profiling with 168-gene panel. In cohort B, T790M was the predominant acquired resistance mechanism, detected in 51.5% (53/103) of progressive tumors, followed by amplifications in EGFR (15.5%, 16/103) and MET (6.8%, 7/103). Contrastingly, cohort A had a significantly lower rate of T790 M mutation (35.5%, 11/31, p = 0.0003), followed by mutations in TP53 (29.0%, 9/31), RB1 (9.7%, 3/31), SMAD4 (3.2%, 1/31) and EGFR V834 L (3.2%, 1/31) and amplifications in EGFR (9.7%, 3/31), and MET(6.5%, 2/31). Conclusion Treatment with first-line A + T significantly extends the time to progression and increases the response rate with acceptable safety profile. T790 M was the most common acquired resistance mechanism but it was less common in patients who received A + T.