医学
伤口愈合
方差分析
临床实习
重复措施设计
外科
内科学
物理疗法
统计
数学
作者
Nancy A. Stotts,George T. Rodeheaver,David R. Thomas,Robert Frantz,Alfred A. Bartolucci,Carrie Sussman,Betty Ferrell,Janet Cuddigan,JoAnn Maklebust
出处
期刊:The Journals of Gerontology
[Oxford University Press]
日期:2001-12-01
卷期号:56 (12): M795-M799
被引量:186
标识
DOI:10.1093/gerona/56.12.m795
摘要
Currently, there is no instrument that provides an accurate and simple method of monitoring pressure ulcer healing in clinical practice. This article reports the two studies that were conducted to assess the validity of the Pressure Ulcer Scale for Healing (PUSH) as a tool to monitor healing of stage II-IV pressure ulcers.Subjects in both studies (N = 103 and N = 269) were elderly (mean Study 1, 75 years, mean Study 2, 80 years), and the majority were women (Study 1, 51%, Study 2, 70%). Study data were extracted from patients' permanent records.Principal components analysis confirmed that the PUSH tool accounted for 58% to 74% of the wound healing variance over a 10-week period in Study 1 and 40% to 57% of the wound healing variance over a 12-week period in Study 2. In addition, multiple regression analysis, used to measure the sensitivity of the model to total healing, showed PUSH accounted for 39% of the variance in 6 weeks and 31% of the variance over 12 weeks (p <.001; Studies 1 and 2, respectively).Data from these two studies confirmed that the PUSH tool, with the components of length times width, exudate amount, and tissue type, is a valid and sensitive measure of pressure ulcer healing. It is a practical approach that provides clinically valid data regarding pressure ulcer healing. Further testing is needed to confirm these findings.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI