沉思
心理学
任务(项目管理)
动作(物理)
认知心理学
发展心理学
社会心理学
认知
量子力学
物理
经济
神经科学
管理
作者
Natalie J. Ciarocco,Kathleen D. Vohs,Roy F. Baumeister
出处
期刊:Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology
[Guilford Publications]
日期:2010-12-01
卷期号:29 (10): 1057-1073
被引量:54
标识
DOI:10.1521/jscp.2010.29.10.1057
摘要
Is there an adaptive side to rumination? We tested whether rumination that is focused on correcting past mistakes and active goal achievement could produce positive outcomes; this is in contrast to rumination that focuses on the implications of failure (i.e., state rumination) and task-irrelevant rumination. In all studies, participants received failure feedback on an initial task. A second task similar to the first provided an opportunity for improvement. Studies 1 and 2 manipulated type of ruminative thought such that it was action-focused, state-focused, or task-irrelevant. Action-focused rumination led to performance improvement relative to the other two conditions. Experiment 3 allowed participants to ruminate naturalistically. The more that participants' rumination contained action-focused thoughts, the more their performance improved. Hence, rumination can yield benefits if it focuses on correcting errors and goal attainment.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI