审计
联合审计
质量审核
会计
业务
职位(财务)
质量(理念)
功能(生物学)
质量保证
内部审计
营销
财务
服务(商务)
哲学
认识论
生物
进化生物学
作者
Renske A.M. de Kleijn,Anouschka van Leeuwen
标识
DOI:10.1177/1609406918763214
摘要
Arguably, quality assurance is more complicated in qualitative studies than in quantitative studies. Several procedures for quality assurance are available, among which the audit procedure as proposed by Akkerman, Admiraal, Brekelmans, and Oost. In this article, we reflect on this procedure based on our own experiences as well as based on a review of studies in which the audit procedure was employed. More specifically, we discuss (1) the choice for an auditor and the relationship between auditee and auditor and (2) the function of the audit. We propose that future auditees (a) explicitly report on the auditee–auditor relationship, (b) explicitly report on the function of their audit, and (c) have their audit trail documents available for review. With this methodological position paper, we aim to contribute to the current call to make social science studies and their conclusions more transparent and thereby to enhance the quality of qualitative studies.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI