The Impact of Vancomycin and Cefazolin as Standard Preoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Surgical Site Infections Following Instrumented Spinal Fusion

医学 万古霉素 预防性抗生素 头孢唑林 抗生素 手术部位感染 外科 脊柱融合术 椎间盘炎 围手术期 回顾性队列研究 氟氯西林 庆大霉素 麻醉 金黄色葡萄球菌 细菌 微生物学 生物 遗传学
作者
Wylie Y. Lopez,Sean M Rider,Kenneth Nwosu,Erick R. Kazarian,Justin A. Blucher,Erin M Schoenfeld,Andrew K. Simpson,James D. Kang,Andrew J. Schoenfeld
出处
期刊:Spine [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:44 (6): E366-E371 被引量:15
标识
DOI:10.1097/brs.0000000000002839
摘要

In Brief Study Design. Retrospective cohort study. Objective. To assess whether administration of prophylactic vancomycin, in addition to cefazolin decreased revision surgeries for postoperative infection (SSI) as well as the need for revisions overall. Summary of Background Data. In 2010 our institution implemented an antibiotic prophylaxis regimen consisting of intravenous vancomycin and cefazolin that applied to all patients receiving surgical implants. The impact of this change in prophylactic antibiotic regimen on SSIs following instrumented spinal fusions remains unknown. Methods. We conducted a prepost analysis evaluating the effect of the change in antibiotic prophylaxis on SSIs following instrumented spinal fusions. We collected data on all eligible patients over the course of 2005 to 2009 and 2011 to 2015. We used logistic regression techniques to evaluate unadjusted results for the prophylactic antibiotic protocol on all revision surgeries, as well as those for SSI, followed by sequential adjustments for sociodemographic factors and surgical characteristics. Results. Revision surgeries performed for a diagnosis of infection were reduced from a rate of 4% (n = 57) in the period 2005 to 2009 to 2% (n = 44) over 2011 to 2015 (P < 0.001). At the same time, the incidence of revision surgeries for any cause was also reduced (14% in 2005–2009 vs. 9% in 2011–2015; P < 0.001). In adjusted analysis, the odds of a revision procedure for SSI were reduced by 50% following introduction of the protocol (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.33, 0.76). No significant difference in the organisms responsible for SSI was identified between 2005 and 2009 and 2011 and 2015 (P = 0.22). Conclusion. This natural experiment has shown some utility for a preoperative prophylactic antibiotic regimen of vancomycin and cefazolin, including meaningful reductions in revision procedures performed for SSI. This is the first effort we are aware of to consider a uniform institutional protocol that employs the use of intravenous vancomycin and cefazolin as prophylactic agents. Level of Evidence: 2 We conducted a prepost analysis evaluating the effect of the mandated change in institutional antibiotic prophylaxis regimen on infections following spine surgery. We report some utility for a preoperative prophylactic antibiotic regimen of vancomycin and cefazolin, including meaningful reductions in revision procedures performed for infection.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
大个应助没烦恼采纳,获得10
刚刚
3D完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
otaro发布了新的文献求助30
2秒前
2秒前
3D发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
nn发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
欢喜的尔烟完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
apricity完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
wanci应助呵呵采纳,获得10
4秒前
大龙哥886应助舒克大王采纳,获得10
5秒前
积极土豆完成签到,获得积分10
5秒前
5秒前
Akim应助享受仅有的拥有采纳,获得30
5秒前
lxaiczn发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
9秒前
帅气的Taq酶完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
10秒前
alllllpi发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
11秒前
13秒前
Untitled应助清新的伟泽采纳,获得10
13秒前
万能图书馆应助idannn采纳,获得10
15秒前
凉小远完成签到,获得积分10
15秒前
16秒前
动听的秋白完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
17秒前
wxx发布了新的文献求助20
17秒前
18秒前
18秒前
李健应助阔达的道之采纳,获得10
18秒前
打打应助2024910298采纳,获得10
19秒前
舒克大王完成签到,获得积分10
20秒前
辣辣发布了新的文献求助10
20秒前
星星亮完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
21秒前
糖宝完成签到,获得积分10
21秒前
英姑应助麦满分采纳,获得10
21秒前
23秒前
zzk完成签到,获得积分10
25秒前
26秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
APA handbook of humanistic and existential psychology: Clinical and social applications (Vol. 2) 2000
Cronologia da história de Macau 1600
Handbook on Climate Mobility 1111
Current concept for improving treatment of prostate cancer based on combination of LH-RH agonists with other agents 1000
Research Handbook on the Law of the Sea 1000
Contemporary Debates in Epistemology (3rd Edition) 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 生物化学 物理 复合材料 内科学 催化作用 物理化学 光电子学 细胞生物学 基因 电极 遗传学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 6174831
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 8002185
关于积分的说明 16643648
捐赠科研通 5277854
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2814802
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1794386
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1660160