The Impact of Vancomycin and Cefazolin as Standard Preoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis on Surgical Site Infections Following Instrumented Spinal Fusion

医学 万古霉素 预防性抗生素 头孢唑林 抗生素 手术部位感染 外科 脊柱融合术 椎间盘炎 围手术期 回顾性队列研究 氟氯西林 庆大霉素 麻醉 金黄色葡萄球菌 细菌 微生物学 生物 遗传学
作者
Wylie Y. Lopez,Sean M. Rider,Kenneth Nwosu,Erick R. Kazarian,Justin A. Blucher,Erin M. Schoenfeld,Andrew K. Simpson,James D. Kang,Andrew J. Schoenfeld
出处
期刊:Spine [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:44 (6): E366-E371 被引量:28
标识
DOI:10.1097/brs.0000000000002839
摘要

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether administration of prophylactic vancomycin, in addition to cefazolin decreased revision surgeries for postoperative infection (SSI) as well as the need for revisions overall. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In 2010 our institution implemented an antibiotic prophylaxis regimen consisting of intravenous vancomycin and cefazolin that applied to all patients receiving surgical implants. The impact of this change in prophylactic antibiotic regimen on SSIs following instrumented spinal fusions remains unknown. METHODS: We conducted a prepost analysis evaluating the effect of the change in antibiotic prophylaxis on SSIs following instrumented spinal fusions. We collected data on all eligible patients over the course of 2005 to 2009 and 2011 to 2015. We used logistic regression techniques to evaluate unadjusted results for the prophylactic antibiotic protocol on all revision surgeries, as well as those for SSI, followed by sequential adjustments for sociodemographic factors and surgical characteristics. RESULTS: Revision surgeries performed for a diagnosis of infection were reduced from a rate of 4% (n = 57) in the period 2005 to 2009 to 2% (n = 44) over 2011 to 2015 (P < 0.001). At the same time, the incidence of revision surgeries for any cause was also reduced (14% in 2005-2009 vs. 9% in 2011-2015; P < 0.001). In adjusted analysis, the odds of a revision procedure for SSI were reduced by 50% following introduction of the protocol (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.33, 0.76). No significant difference in the organisms responsible for SSI was identified between 2005 and 2009 and 2011 and 2015 (P = 0.22). CONCLUSION: This natural experiment has shown some utility for a preoperative prophylactic antibiotic regimen of vancomycin and cefazolin, including meaningful reductions in revision procedures performed for SSI. This is the first effort we are aware of to consider a uniform institutional protocol that employs the use of intravenous vancomycin and cefazolin as prophylactic agents. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
复杂大地完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
1秒前
八笔完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
空白完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
杭紫雪完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
小李博士发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
3秒前
fufu完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
zzz627完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
Jack完成签到 ,获得积分10
5秒前
静静小可爱完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
金勇完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
Lawrence完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
shuii完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
nonory完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
大白不白完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Whispers完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
归海从梦完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
lolo完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
无花果应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
8秒前
CodeCraft应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
sagitar应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
9秒前
欢呼的红牛完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
kwangil完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Hello应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
9秒前
rayqiang完成签到,获得积分0
9秒前
彭于晏应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
rayq完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
正直的雨双完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
Lucas应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
JamesPei应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
9秒前
dde应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
六六完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
Lucas应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
lanrete完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
烂番茄完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
SciGPT应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
10秒前
zhao完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
serenity完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
科研通AI6.2应助归海从梦采纳,获得10
12秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Autoparametric Resonance in Mechanical Systems 1000
Effects of Two Weeks of Red Light Therapy on Choroidal Thickness and Axial Length in Young Adults 700
Cosmos as Art Object: Studies in Plato's Timaeus and Other Dialogues 600
Management and the Arts 510
Matrix Methods in Data Mining and Pattern Recognition Second Edition 510
the fractional Laplacian 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 纳米技术 工程类 有机化学 化学工程 生物化学 计算机科学 内科学 物理 复合材料 催化作用 细胞生物学 无机化学 光电子学 物理化学 电极 基因
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 7668100
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 9236700
关于积分的说明 19881423
捐赠科研通 7237383
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 3284075
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 2442947
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 2285588