[Moderating effect of sense of coherence between occupational stress and depression].

Objective: To explore the moderating effect of sense of coherence in the relationship between occupational stress and depression. Methods: From June to September in 2018, migrant workers were purposively selected from the urban (including office buildings, shopping malls, barber shops or restaurants and other service enterprises) and suburban (including microelectronics, internet, clothing processing and art design and other factories) areas of Shanghai. A total of 3 034 people were investigated and 2 573 valid questionnaires were collected. Patient health questionnaire (PHQ), sense of coherence questionnaire (SOC) and job content questionnaire (JCQ) were used to investigate the levels depression, sense of coherence and occupational stress. Hierarchical regression analysis was used to analyze the moderating effect of sense of coherence on occupational stress and depression, and SPSS PROCESS macro program and Bootstrap method were used to further explore the moderating effect of sense of coherence. Results: The age of total 2 573 migrant workers was (28.24±7.33) years old and 49.79% of them were males. The scores of depression, occupational stress and sense of coherence were 6.67±4.74, 28.45±4.38 and 62.02±10.89, respectively. The depression level was positively correlated with occupational stress (r=0.33, P=0.007), and negatively correlated with sense of coherence (r=-0.53, P=0.003). The hierarchy regression analysis suggested that the interaction between occupational stress and sense of coherence was associated with depression symptom (β=-0.07, P=0.001). Bootstrap analysis showed that occupational stress was not associated with depression symptom with high level of sense of sense of coherence (β=0.04, 95%CI=-0.01-0.10), while occupational stress was associated with depression symptom with low level of sense of sense of coherence (β=0.19, 95%CI=0.14-0.23). Conclusion: The high level of sense of coherence has a moderating effect on the relationship between occupational stress and depressive symptoms, while the low level of sense of coherence does not have this effect.目的： 探讨心理一致感在职业紧张与抑郁间的调节效应。 方法： 于2018年6—9月，采用立意抽样的方式，在上海市主城区（以写字楼、商场、理发店或饭店等服务企业为主）和郊区企业（类型涉及微电子、互联网、服装加工及艺术设计等工厂）抽取非上海户籍流动工人为研究对象进行问卷调查，收集研究对象的人口学特征。共调查了3 034名研究对象，回收有效问卷2 573份。采用患者健康量表（PHQ）、心理一致感量表（SOC）和工作内容问卷（JCQ）对抑郁、心理一致感和职业紧张水平进行评定。采用层次回归分析初步分析心理一致感在职业紧张与抑郁间的调节效应关系，并探讨心理一致感的调节效应。 结果： 2 573名研究对象年龄为（28.24±7.33）岁，男性1 281名（49.79 %），抑郁、职业紧张和心理一致感得分分别为6.67±4.74、28.45±4.38和62.02±10.89。抑郁水平与职业紧张正相关（r=0.33, P=0.007），与心理一致感负相关（r=-0.53, P=0.003）。层次回归分析显示，职业紧张与心理一致感的交互作用与抑郁症有关（β=-0.07, P=0.001）；Bootstrap分析显示，当心理一致感水平较高时，抑郁症状和职业紧张关联无统计学意义（β=0.04，95%CI=-0.01~0.10），在心理一致感水平较低时，二者关联有统计学意义（β=0.19，95%CI=0.14~0.23）。 结论： 高水平心理一致感在职业紧张与抑郁间具有调节效应，低水平的心理一致感不具有该效应。.