Instruments assessing medication literacy in adult recipients of care: A systematic review of measurement properties

奇纳 心理信息 梅德林 医学 背景(考古学) 系统回顾 健康素养 结构效度 内容有效性 医疗保健 家庭医学 心理测量学 护理部 临床心理学 心理干预 政治学 法学 古生物学 经济 生物 经济增长
作者
Jenny Gentizon,Julian Hirt,Cécile Jaques,Pierre Olivier Lang,Cédric Mabire
出处
期刊:International Journal of Nursing Studies [Elsevier BV]
卷期号:113: 103785-103785 被引量:35
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2020.103785
摘要

The assessment of medication literacy in patients is an important step in assisting clinicians to plan for education, prescription simplification, assistance and/or medication aids. There have been several attempts to develop a standardised, objective measure of medication literacy. The objectives of this systematic review were to critically appraise, compare and summarise the measurement properties of existing instruments that assess medication literacy in adult recipients of care. A systematic review was performed. Search methods: Structured searches were conducted in Embase, MEDLINE PubMed, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO and Web of Science Core Collection in March 2020. Additional searches were performed in ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, DART Europe, and Google Scholar, followed by citation tracking of included studies. Two researchers independently identified eligible studies. Two researchers then assessed the methodological quality of the studies and quality of measurement properties, using the Consensus-based Standards for selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines. A best-evidence synthesis for each instrument was performed. From the 5035 citations, 17 studies were included that concerned 13 instruments using different administration methods (i.e., performancebased or self-report), medication type (i.e., prescribed or nonprescribed) and context of use (i.e., clinical or community settings). Very low- to moderate-quality evidence supported satisfactory content validity regarding relevance and comprehensibility, while comprehensiveness remained inconsistent. Other measurement properties were less frequently examined and were supported by moderate-quality evidence (i.e., structural validity) to low- or very low-quality evidence (i.e., internal consistency, reliability, construct validity). The bestvalidated instrument is the unidimensional 14-item Medication Literacy in Spanish and English assessment tool (MedLitRxSE), based on direct testing of participant performance regarding four hypothetical scenarios on medication use. Nine instruments have the potential to be recommended but require additional research, while for others, their psychometric soundness is too limited and they require content revisions. This is the first systematic review to identify instruments for medication literacy. None of the identified instruments had all measurement properties properly assessed and none reported measurement invariance, measurement error and responsiveness of the instrument. Further research is necessary for a better theoretical understanding of medication literacy in order to assist health professionals in identifying patient needs for education, regimen simplification, assistance and/or medication aids. Such research will help conceptualise new instruments that not only cover relevant domains dedicated to specific populations (e.g., polymorbid and/or older individuals), but also exhibit satisfactory measurement properties.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
Akim应助duckspy采纳,获得10
1秒前
那种完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
liuyanq完成签到,获得积分20
1秒前
2秒前
普鲁卡因发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
加油杨完成签到 ,获得积分10
4秒前
liuyanq发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
随风完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
米九完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
zhao完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
普鲁卡因发布了新的文献求助10
17秒前
zj完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
蓝橙完成签到,获得积分10
24秒前
28秒前
GD88完成签到,获得积分10
29秒前
糟糕的梨愁完成签到,获得积分10
30秒前
莫西莫西完成签到 ,获得积分10
31秒前
小趴蔡完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
唐唐发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
飘逸剑身完成签到,获得积分10
36秒前
airtermis完成签到 ,获得积分10
36秒前
gfasdjsjdsjd完成签到,获得积分10
37秒前
37秒前
杨宁完成签到 ,获得积分10
37秒前
MchemG应助transition采纳,获得20
38秒前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
39秒前
lxy发布了新的文献求助10
41秒前
gfasdjsjdsjd发布了新的文献求助10
42秒前
JCao727完成签到,获得积分10
42秒前
42秒前
43秒前
OAHCIL完成签到 ,获得积分10
44秒前
lixueao发布了新的文献求助10
45秒前
无辜的行云完成签到 ,获得积分0
48秒前
FIN应助gfasdjsjdsjd采纳,获得20
50秒前
今后应助gfasdjsjdsjd采纳,获得10
50秒前
排骨炖豆角完成签到 ,获得积分10
52秒前
一叶知秋应助大橙子采纳,获得10
54秒前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Handbook of Industrial Diamonds.Vol2 1100
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 550
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4038128
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3575831
关于积分的说明 11373827
捐赠科研通 3305610
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1819255
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 892655
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815022