MRI‐Based Multiple Instance Convolutional Neural Network for Increased Accuracy in the Differentiation of Borderline and Malignant Epithelial Ovarian Tumors

Preoperative differentiation of borderline from malignant epithelial ovarian tumors (BEOT vs. MEOT) is challenging and can significantly impact surgical management.To develop a multiple instance convolutional neural network (MICNN) that can differentiate BEOT from MEOT, and to compare its diagnostic performance with that of radiologists.Retrospective study of eight clinical centers.Between January 2010 and June 2018, a total of 501 women (mean age, 48.93 ± 14.05 years) with histopathologically confirmed BEOT (N = 165) or MEOT (N = 336) were divided into the training (N = 342) and validation cohorts (N = 159).Three axial sequences from 1.5 or 3 T scanner were used: fast spin echo T2-weighted imaging with fat saturation (T2WI FS), echo planar diffusion-weighted imaging, and 2D volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (CE-T1WI) with FS.Three monoparametric MICNN models were built based on T2WI FS, apparent diffusion coefficient map, and CE-T1WI. Based on these monoparametric models, we constructed an early multiparametric (EMP) model and a late multiparametric (LMP) model using early and late information fusion methods, respectively. The diagnostic performance of the models was evaluated using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and compared to the performance of six radiologists with varying levels of experience.We used DeLong test, chi-square test, Mann-Whitney U-test, and t-test, with significance level of 0.05.Both EMP and LMP models differentiated BEOT from MEOT, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.855 (95% CI, 0.795-0.915) and 0.884 (95% CI, 0.831-0.938), respectively. The AUC of the LMP model was significantly higher than the radiologists' pooled AUC (0.884 vs. 0.797).The developed MICNN models can effectively differentiate BEOT from MEOT and the diagnostic performances (AUCs) were more superior than that of the radiologists' assessments.3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 2.