亲爱的研友该休息了!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整的填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您度过漫漫科研夜!身体可是革命的本钱,早点休息,好梦!

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Training vs. Conventional Strength Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effect on Strength Development

刺激 荟萃分析 医学 力量训练 物理医学与康复 培训(气象学) 肌肉力量 内科学 物理 气象学
作者
Kevin Happ,Michael Behringer
出处
期刊:Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
卷期号:36 (12): 3527-3540 被引量:10
标识
DOI:10.1519/jsc.0000000000004119
摘要

Happ, KA, and Behringer, M. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation Training vs. conventional strength training: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect on strength development. J Strength Cond Res 36(12): 3527-3540, 2022-A systematic review of the current state of literature and a meta-analysis were conducted to compare the strength development between neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and conventional strength training when training volume is matched. Searches of PubMed and several other databases were conducted for studies that met the following primary inclusion criteria: randomized studies of >20 days duration with a sample size of >4 subjects in each group ("voluntary contraction" [VC] and "electrically stimulated" [ES]) conducted with percutaneous stimulation only in healthy individuals at equal training volume. Finally, a total of 19 studies were included in the analysis. When comparing strength gains between groups (ES-VC), no favorable effect toward a training method could be observed (0.023 hg [95% CI: -0.198 to 0.246, p = 0.836]). Subgroup analyses were performed based on the application type (NMES evoked and NMES onto voluntary contractions) and stimulation frequency. Both analyses revealed no favorable effect and significant difference of groups (significance level set at 0.05). A meta-regression evaluated the relationship between stimulation frequency and effect size difference. The regression showed a tendency of higher stimulation frequencies being associated with higher study effect size differences (predicted effect size = -0.599 + 0.008 (Hz) ( p = 0.176)). The findings indicate that training with NMES results in virtually identical strength gains compared with conventional strength training when training volume is matched. If training with NMES is preferred, the stimulation frequency type (regular or Burst Mode Alternating Current) can be chosen according to preference without loss of effectiveness.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
赘婿应助诚心的月光采纳,获得10
1秒前
科研通AI5应助研友_LBRPOL采纳,获得10
3秒前
吃了吃了完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
潇洒绿蕊完成签到,获得积分10
9秒前
sunshine完成签到 ,获得积分10
9秒前
归海梦岚完成签到,获得积分0
12秒前
ccc完成签到 ,获得积分10
12秒前
繁荣的心情完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
16秒前
丘比特应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
19秒前
20秒前
22秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
28秒前
朴实初夏完成签到,获得积分10
32秒前
FashionBoy应助朴实初夏采纳,获得10
36秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
44秒前
50秒前
靖123456完成签到,获得积分10
52秒前
朴实初夏发布了新的文献求助10
55秒前
57秒前
靖123456发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
情怀应助诚心的月光采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
科研通AI5应助天真咖啡豆采纳,获得10
1分钟前
杰杰小杰发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
斯文败类应助getgetting采纳,获得10
1分钟前
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
Makinosaito完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
高分求助中
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review 1000
Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences, Global Edition, 6th edition 600
こんなに痛いのにどうして「なんでもない」と医者にいわれてしまうのでしょうか 510
Walter Gilbert: Selected Works 500
An Annotated Checklist of Dinosaur Species by Continent 500
岡本唐貴自伝的回想画集 500
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 内科学 复合材料 物理化学 电极 遗传学 量子力学 基因 冶金 催化作用
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3660939
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3222150
关于积分的说明 9743768
捐赠科研通 2931683
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1605162
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 757705
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 734462