Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Training vs. Conventional Strength Training: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effect on Strength Development

刺激 荟萃分析 医学 力量训练 物理医学与康复 培训(气象学) 肌肉力量 内科学 物理 气象学
作者
Kevin Happ,Michael Behringer
出处
期刊:Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research [Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer)]
卷期号:36 (12): 3527-3540 被引量:10
标识
DOI:10.1519/jsc.0000000000004119
摘要

Happ, KA, and Behringer, M. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation Training vs. conventional strength training: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect on strength development. J Strength Cond Res 36(12): 3527-3540, 2022-A systematic review of the current state of literature and a meta-analysis were conducted to compare the strength development between neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) and conventional strength training when training volume is matched. Searches of PubMed and several other databases were conducted for studies that met the following primary inclusion criteria: randomized studies of >20 days duration with a sample size of >4 subjects in each group ("voluntary contraction" [VC] and "electrically stimulated" [ES]) conducted with percutaneous stimulation only in healthy individuals at equal training volume. Finally, a total of 19 studies were included in the analysis. When comparing strength gains between groups (ES-VC), no favorable effect toward a training method could be observed (0.023 hg [95% CI: -0.198 to 0.246, p = 0.836]). Subgroup analyses were performed based on the application type (NMES evoked and NMES onto voluntary contractions) and stimulation frequency. Both analyses revealed no favorable effect and significant difference of groups (significance level set at 0.05). A meta-regression evaluated the relationship between stimulation frequency and effect size difference. The regression showed a tendency of higher stimulation frequencies being associated with higher study effect size differences (predicted effect size = -0.599 + 0.008 (Hz) ( p = 0.176)). The findings indicate that training with NMES results in virtually identical strength gains compared with conventional strength training when training volume is matched. If training with NMES is preferred, the stimulation frequency type (regular or Burst Mode Alternating Current) can be chosen according to preference without loss of effectiveness.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
善学以致用应助DIDIDI采纳,获得10
2秒前
布丁拿铁发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
pluto应助vastom采纳,获得10
2秒前
英姑应助MGQQbg采纳,获得50
2秒前
哲学带带师完成签到,获得积分10
3秒前
3秒前
asdfzxcv应助cw采纳,获得10
3秒前
hx完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
英姑应助memory采纳,获得10
4秒前
Hana发布了新的文献求助20
4秒前
4秒前
Miao发布了新的文献求助10
5秒前
6秒前
仲滋滋发布了新的文献求助10
10秒前
研友_VZG7GZ应助KasenDen采纳,获得10
11秒前
Ding-Ding完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
12秒前
彭洪凯完成签到,获得积分10
14秒前
徐徐完成签到 ,获得积分10
14秒前
hzw完成签到,获得积分10
17秒前
望舒完成签到,获得积分10
18秒前
18秒前
wsuser完成签到,获得积分10
19秒前
Orange应助zzg采纳,获得10
21秒前
脊束发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
赘婿应助加油采纳,获得10
23秒前
酷波er应助橙汁采纳,获得10
24秒前
suiaaaa发布了新的文献求助10
25秒前
26秒前
29秒前
风清扬发布了新的文献求助20
30秒前
雨中漫步完成签到,获得积分0
30秒前
31秒前
31秒前
詹妮发布了新的文献求助10
32秒前
32秒前
34秒前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Molecular Biology of Cancer: Mechanisms, Targets, and Therapeutics 3000
Les Mantodea de guyane 2500
VASCULITIS(血管炎)Rheumatic Disease Clinics (Clinics Review Articles) —— 《风湿病临床》(临床综述文章) 1000
Feldspar inclusion dating of ceramics and burnt stones 1000
What is the Future of Psychotherapy in a Digital Age? 801
The Psychological Quest for Meaning 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5971903
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 7290045
关于积分的说明 15993025
捐赠科研通 5109810
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2744103
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1709926
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1621839