心理干预
荟萃分析
课程
认知
医学
体育
睡眠剥夺对认知功能的影响
物理疗法
心理学
医学教育
内科学
教育学
护理部
精神科
作者
Antônio García‐Hermoso,Robinson Ramírez‐Vélez,David R. Lubans,Míkel Izquierdo
标识
DOI:10.1136/bjsports-2021-104112
摘要
To determine the effects of interventions aimed at optimising the quantity and quality of physical education (PE) on cognition and academic performance in children and adolescents.A systematic review and meta-analysis.Studies from electronic databases from inception to 3 January 2021 were identified.Experimental studies that assessed the effect of quantity-based (ie, increasing the amount of curriculum time allocated to PE) or quality-based (ie, increasing students' participation in physical activity during PE) PE interventions, or both, on changes in cognition and/or academic performance in youth (aged 5-18 years) were included.19 trials comprising 8676 youth (46.5% girls) were included. Individual quality-based PE interventions increased cognition performance (Hedges' g=0.38, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.60; I2=83.70%), mainly in primary education settings (g=0.48, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.89; I2=90.43%). Academic performance, principally mathematics-related skills, was also increased by quality-based PE interventions (g=0.15, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.24; I2=41.75%). Among these interventions, teaching strategies favoured similar results, but without heterogeneity in the results (g=0.12, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.18; I2=0%). In contrast, quantity-based PE interventions had a very small and non-significant effect on academic performance (g=0.09, 95% CI -0.05 to 0.24; Q=11.65; I2=48.48%). Finally, there were no differences between the three PE interventions (ie, quantity, quality, and combined PE interventions) in regard to academic performance.Improving the quality of PE classes may improve students' cognition and academic performance in children and adolescents. Importantly, allocating more time for PE does not seem to compromise this performance.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI