Measurement of quality of recovery after surgery using the 15-item quality of recovery scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis

置信区间 荟萃分析 可靠性(半导体) 判别效度 比例(比率) 统计 医学 心理测量学 内部一致性 数学 内科学 功率(物理) 物理 量子力学
作者
Paul S. Myles,Mark Shulman,Jennifer Reilly,Jessica Kasza,Lorena Romero
出处
期刊:BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia [Elsevier]
卷期号:128 (6): 1029-1039 被引量:62
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.009
摘要

There are very few patient-centred global outcome measures of recovery in the days or weeks after surgery. This meta-analysis evaluated the psychometric properties and clinical acceptability of the 15-item quality of recovery (QoR-15) scale.We searched bibliographic databases for studies undertaking psychometric evaluation of the QoR-15 or using the QoR-15 as an outcome measure after surgery. Record screening, data extraction, and quality assessments were independently done by two researchers. Weighted averages estimating overall summary statistics across all the studies were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. Pooled correlation coefficients were transformed using a Fisher z-transformation and then back-transformed to calculate pooled results. The four co-primary endpoints were validity, reliability, responsiveness, and clinical utility of the QoR-15 scale.A total of 26 unique studies met the eligibility criteria, yielding up to 22 847 patients across 16 countries, in 15 languages. A further 172 studies in a further 18 countries and six languages used the QoR-15 as an outcome measure. The QoR-15 had excellent discriminant validity, with the mean difference in QoR-15 scores in patients with and without postoperative complications (9.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.9-13.3; P<0.001), and good convergent validity (for a global visual analogue recovery scale, pooled r=0.63; 95% CI, 0.54-0.71). There was excellent reliability: internal consistency (pooled α=0.85; 95% CI, 0.83-0.87), split-half reliability=0.80 (95% CI, 0.75-0.84), and test-retest reliability=0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.98). There was also high responsiveness (pooled standardised response mean=0.87; 95% CI, 0.65-1.08), patient recruitment into evaluation studies (96%; 95% CI, 93-99), and excellent completion and return rates (91%; 95% CI, 84-96). The mean time to complete the QoR-15 was 2.7 (95% CI, 2.2-3.1) min.The QoR-15 is a valid, reliable, and responsive patient-centred outcome metric in surgical patients. It is highly acceptable to both patients and clinicians.Open Science Framework Identifier: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/78HTA.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
lai发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
彭彭发布了新的文献求助10
刚刚
ggb完成签到,获得积分10
刚刚
1秒前
1秒前
1秒前
迅速宛筠完成签到,获得积分10
1秒前
弄井完成签到,获得积分10
2秒前
充电宝应助无悔呀采纳,获得10
2秒前
2秒前
3秒前
000发布了新的文献求助10
3秒前
噔噔噔噔完成签到,获得积分10
4秒前
5秒前
刘怀蕊发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
舒心赛凤发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
文艺明杰完成签到,获得积分10
6秒前
7秒前
7秒前
wawuuuuu完成签到,获得积分10
7秒前
Akim应助谢家宝树采纳,获得10
7秒前
LU发布了新的文献求助10
7秒前
8秒前
pinging完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
通~发布了新的文献求助10
9秒前
lai完成签到,获得积分20
9秒前
9秒前
10秒前
10秒前
隐形曼青应助彭彭采纳,获得10
11秒前
卡卡完成签到 ,获得积分10
11秒前
科目三应助季夏采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
今后应助激动的一手采纳,获得10
12秒前
许中原完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
无限的幻灵完成签到,获得积分10
12秒前
13秒前
整齐路灯完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
紧张的梦岚应助跳跃乘风采纳,获得20
13秒前
简单水杯完成签到 ,获得积分10
13秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Social media impact on athlete mental health: #RealityCheck 1020
Ensartinib (Ensacove) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 1000
Unseen Mendieta: The Unpublished Works of Ana Mendieta 1000
Bacterial collagenases and their clinical applications 800
El viaje de una vida: Memorias de María Lecea 800
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3527742
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3107867
关于积分的说明 9286956
捐赠科研通 2805612
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1540026
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 716884
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 709762