Measurement of quality of recovery after surgery using the 15-item quality of recovery scale: a systematic review and meta-analysis

置信区间 荟萃分析 可靠性(半导体) 判别效度 比例(比率) 统计 医学 心理测量学 内部一致性 数学 内科学 量子力学 物理 功率(物理)
作者
Paul S. Myles,Mark Shulman,Jennifer Reilly,Jessica Kasza,Lorena Romero
出处
期刊:BJA: British Journal of Anaesthesia [Elsevier]
卷期号:128 (6): 1029-1039 被引量:155
标识
DOI:10.1016/j.bja.2022.03.009
摘要

There are very few patient-centred global outcome measures of recovery in the days or weeks after surgery. This meta-analysis evaluated the psychometric properties and clinical acceptability of the 15-item quality of recovery (QoR-15) scale.We searched bibliographic databases for studies undertaking psychometric evaluation of the QoR-15 or using the QoR-15 as an outcome measure after surgery. Record screening, data extraction, and quality assessments were independently done by two researchers. Weighted averages estimating overall summary statistics across all the studies were calculated using random-effects meta-analysis. Pooled correlation coefficients were transformed using a Fisher z-transformation and then back-transformed to calculate pooled results. The four co-primary endpoints were validity, reliability, responsiveness, and clinical utility of the QoR-15 scale.A total of 26 unique studies met the eligibility criteria, yielding up to 22 847 patients across 16 countries, in 15 languages. A further 172 studies in a further 18 countries and six languages used the QoR-15 as an outcome measure. The QoR-15 had excellent discriminant validity, with the mean difference in QoR-15 scores in patients with and without postoperative complications (9.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.9-13.3; P<0.001), and good convergent validity (for a global visual analogue recovery scale, pooled r=0.63; 95% CI, 0.54-0.71). There was excellent reliability: internal consistency (pooled α=0.85; 95% CI, 0.83-0.87), split-half reliability=0.80 (95% CI, 0.75-0.84), and test-retest reliability=0.97 (95% CI, 0.95-0.98). There was also high responsiveness (pooled standardised response mean=0.87; 95% CI, 0.65-1.08), patient recruitment into evaluation studies (96%; 95% CI, 93-99), and excellent completion and return rates (91%; 95% CI, 84-96). The mean time to complete the QoR-15 was 2.7 (95% CI, 2.2-3.1) min.The QoR-15 is a valid, reliable, and responsive patient-centred outcome metric in surgical patients. It is highly acceptable to both patients and clinicians.Open Science Framework Identifier: DOI 10.17605/OSF.IO/78HTA.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
等于零完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
Hzml完成签到 ,获得积分10
3秒前
8秒前
伶俐芷珊发布了新的文献求助10
12秒前
wxxsx发布了新的文献求助10
16秒前
净心完成签到 ,获得积分10
19秒前
无情的冰香完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
mp5完成签到,获得积分10
27秒前
初心路完成签到 ,获得积分10
30秒前
huenguyenvan完成签到,获得积分10
31秒前
积极从蕾应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
33秒前
彭于晏应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
33秒前
33秒前
wanci应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
33秒前
33秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
40秒前
41秒前
紫焰完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
分手吧亚索完成签到,获得积分10
47秒前
高高完成签到 ,获得积分10
58秒前
Lrcx完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
景清完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
zero发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
怡然傲南发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
奇奇怪怪的大鱼完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
叮叮当当发布了新的文献求助30
1分钟前
小田完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
出厂价完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
魔幻以菱完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
1分钟前
LM完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
叮叮当当发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
阿包完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
Yi完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
小休完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook, Multi-Volume, 5th Edition 临床微生物学程序手册,多卷,第5版 2000
人脑智能与人工智能 1000
King Tyrant 720
Silicon in Organic, Organometallic, and Polymer Chemistry 500
Peptide Synthesis_Methods and Protocols 400
Principles of Plasma Discharges and Materials Processing, 3rd Edition 400
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5603452
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 4688447
关于积分的说明 14853716
捐赠科研通 4692182
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2540735
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1507039
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1471705