YouTubers vs. VTubers: Persuasiveness of human and virtual presenters in promotional videos

影响力营销 说服 产品(数学) 心理学 晋升(国际象棋) 广告 阿凡达 人际交往 背景(考古学) 计算机科学 多媒体 社会心理学 人机交互 政治学 政治 生物 业务 古生物学 营销 关系营销 市场营销管理 法学 数学 几何学
作者
Hiroshi Sakuma,Ao Hori,Minami Murashita,Chisa Kondo,Yoshinori Hijikata
出处
期刊:Frontiers in computer science [Frontiers Media SA]
卷期号:5 被引量:13
标识
DOI:10.3389/fcomp.2023.1043342
摘要

With the recent advances in motion tracking technologies and three-dimensional computer graphics software, communication through avatars has become increasingly popular. Can avatars be sufficiently persuasive, when compared to traditional forms of interpersonal communication? What factors contribute to the persuasiveness of virtual influencers? Existing literature has studied the differences in persuasiveness between human and virtual speakers extensively, particularly in education. However, few studies have been conducted on product promotion. Therefore, in this study, we investigated the characteristics of persuasiveness for humans and virtual influencers, as well as the differences between them in this regard in a more modern and practical situation: product introduction videos used in influencer marketing. Specifically, we recruited participants to watch product introduction videos on YouTube, presented by either humans or avatars. The videos were similar, except for the appearance of the presenter. Before and after watching the videos, the participants were asked to complete a questionnaire about their willingness to purchase the products and the characteristics of presenters' persuasiveness. The results show that although promotion via avatars can increase the participants' willingness to purchase, human influencers were more persuasive. However, the virtual YouTubers (VTubers) were more persuasive in certain product domains. VTubers who can change their appearance to match the product domain have potential for future applications. We also attempted to construct a model of persuasiveness in this pragmatic context based on Dyson's persuasiveness rating scale and the overall impression of the video. The degree of persuasiveness was found to be related to the presenters' likability, whether the presenter was a human or an avatar, the degree of familiarity between the presenter and the audience, the presenters' trustworthiness, and the quality as well as the entertainment level of the video. This model may be helpful for running successful promotions on YouTube. Our findings verify that avatars can be fairly persuasive in some situations, including promotional videos. These findings contribute to the future development of communication through avatars.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
xuxian发布了新的文献求助10
2秒前
Hedy发布了新的文献求助20
3秒前
3秒前
guozizi发布了新的文献求助30
4秒前
传奇3应助NaCl采纳,获得10
6秒前
旭a完成签到,获得积分20
6秒前
8秒前
jerry_x完成签到,获得积分10
8秒前
liux发布了新的文献求助10
8秒前
缓慢如南应助迟大猫采纳,获得10
10秒前
10秒前
11秒前
NexusExplorer应助Chen采纳,获得10
11秒前
在水一方应助高高的无敌采纳,获得10
12秒前
12秒前
xuxian完成签到,获得积分10
13秒前
科研通AI5应助贫穷的塔姆采纳,获得30
14秒前
yaoyao发布了新的文献求助10
15秒前
在水一方应助狮子座采纳,获得10
17秒前
zho发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
绿色心情发布了新的文献求助10
18秒前
18秒前
18秒前
Akim应助ZZZZK采纳,获得10
19秒前
yzheh发布了新的文献求助10
23秒前
23秒前
忧郁的风华完成签到,获得积分10
23秒前
lili-完成签到,获得积分20
23秒前
mmyhn应助sys采纳,获得20
24秒前
Jasper应助吉荣耀采纳,获得10
24秒前
wwyy发布了新的文献求助20
24秒前
Anan完成签到,获得积分20
24秒前
桐桐应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
惊嵐应助科研通管家采纳,获得20
25秒前
赘婿应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
25秒前
Jason应助科研通管家采纳,获得30
25秒前
英俊的铭应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
打打应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
上官若男应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
25秒前
高分求助中
Continuum Thermodynamics and Material Modelling 3000
Production Logging: Theoretical and Interpretive Elements 2700
Mechanistic Modeling of Gas-Liquid Two-Phase Flow in Pipes 2500
Comprehensive Computational Chemistry 1000
Conference Record, IAS Annual Meeting 1977 610
Interest Rate Modeling. Volume 3: Products and Risk Management 600
Interest Rate Modeling. Volume 2: Term Structure Models 600
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 纳米技术 计算机科学 内科学 化学工程 复合材料 基因 遗传学 物理化学 催化作用 量子力学 光电子学 冶金
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 3553933
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3129728
关于积分的说明 9384042
捐赠科研通 2828848
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1555246
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 725940
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 715331