概念化
混乱
心理学
比例(比率)
系统回顾
透视图(图形)
客户参与度
社会化媒体
计算机科学
梅德林
物理
量子力学
人工智能
万维网
政治学
精神分析
法学
作者
Linda D. Hollebeek,Marko Sarstedt,Choukri Menidjel,David E. Sprott,Sigitas Urbonavičius
摘要
Abstract Multiple scales measuring a customer's, or consumer's, engagement (CE) with a brand or specific brand elements (e.g., advertising/social media content) have been proposed in the literature, offering researchers different options to gauge CE. However, the myriad proposed operationalizations can yield confusion among scholars regarding how to best capture CE, exposing a growing issue for CE research. Addressing this issue, we take stock of major scales measuring a CE with a brand or specific brand elements. To achieve this objective, we performed a systematic review of major CE scale development articles (2005 to January 2023) using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) approach. We systematically evaluated these scales in terms of their respective CE conceptualization, dimensionality, itemization, and underlying theoretical perspective. We also identify potential scale‐related risks, or pitfalls, exposing important insight for CE researchers. Overall, the results suggest the existence of theoretical contamination in specific CE measures (e.g., through the inclusion of related concepts in the proposed CE definition), compromising their theoretical rigor and raising a need for scholars to verify the theoretical underpinnings of their adopted CE scales.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI