医学
溶栓
肺栓塞
重症监护医学
经皮
心脏病学
内科学
心肌梗塞
作者
Piotr Pruszczyk,Frederikus Klok Klok,Nils Kucher,Marek Roik,Nicolas Méneveau,Andrew Sharp Sharp,Jens Nielsen-Kudsk Nielsen-Kudsk,Slobodan Obradović,Stefano Barco,Francesco Giannini,Giulio G. Stefanini,Giuseppe Tarantini,Stavros Konstantinides,Dariusz Dudek
出处
期刊:Eurointervention
[Europa Digital and Publishing]
日期:2022-10-01
卷期号:18 (8): e623-e638
被引量:93
标识
DOI:10.4244/eij-d-22-00246
摘要
There is a growing clinical and scientific interest in catheter-directed therapy (CDT) of acute pulmonary embolism (PE). Currently, CDT should be considered for patients with high-risk PE, in whom thrombolysis is contraindicated or has failed. Also, CDT is a treatment option for initially stable patients in whom anticoagulant treatment fails, i.e., those who experience haemodynamic deterioration despite adequately dosed anticoagulation. However, the definition of treatment failure (primary reperfusion therapy or anticoagulation alone) remains an important area of uncertainty. Moreover, several techniques for CDT are available without evidence supporting one over the other, and variation in practice with regard to periprocedural anticoagulation is considerable. The aim of this position paper is to describe the currently available CDT approaches in PE patients and to standardise patient selection, the timing and technique of the procedure itself as well as anticoagulation regimens during CDT. We discuss several clinical scenarios of the clinical evaluation of the "efficacy" of thrombolysis and anticoagulation, including treatment failure with haemodynamic deterioration and treatment failure based on a lack of improvement. This clinical consensus statement serves as a practical guide for CDT, complementary to the formal guidelines.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI