No Difference in 10-year Clinical or Radiographic Outcomes Between Kinematic and Mechanical Alignment in TKA: A Randomized Trial

医学 随机对照试验 骨关节炎 射线照相术 冠状面 生存曲线 沃马克 运动学 物理疗法 口腔正畸科 外科 放射科 内科学 癌症 物理 替代医学 病理 经典力学
作者
John Gibbons,Nina Zeng,Ali Bayan,Matthew L. Walker,Bill Farrington,Simon W. Young
出处
期刊:Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research [Lippincott Williams & Wilkins]
被引量:6
标识
DOI:10.1097/corr.0000000000003193
摘要

Background There is continuing debate about the ideal philosophy for component alignment in TKA. However, there are limited long-term functional and radiographic data on randomized comparisons of kinematic alignment versus mechanical alignment. Questions/purposes We present the 10-year follow-up findings of a single-center, multisurgeon randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing these two alignment philosophies in terms of the following questions: (1) Is there a difference in PROM scores? (2) Is there a difference in survivorship free from revision or reoperation for any cause? (3) Is there a difference in survivorship free from radiographic loosening? Methods Ninety-nine patients undergoing primary TKA for osteoarthritis were randomized to either the mechanical alignment (n = 50) or kinematic alignment (n = 49) group. Eligibility for the study was patients undergoing unilateral TKA for osteoarthritis who were suitable for a cruciate-retaining TKA and could undergo MRI. Patients who had previous osteotomy, coronal alignment > 15° from neutral, a fixed flexion deformity > 15°, or instability whereby constrained components were being considered were excluded. Computer navigation was used in the mechanical alignment group, and patient-specific cutting blocks were used in the kinematic alignment group. At 10 years, 86% (43) of the patients in the mechanical alignment group and 80% (39) in the kinematic alignment group were available for follow-up performed as a per-protocol analysis. The PROMs that we assessed included the Knee Society Score, Oxford Knee Score, WOMAC, Forgotten Joint Score, and EuroQol 5-Dimension score. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess survivorship free from reoperation (any reason) and revision (change or addition of any component). A single blinded observer assessed radiographs for signs of aseptic loosening (as defined by the presence of progressive radiolucent lines in two or more zones), which was reported as survivorship free from loosening. Results At 10 years, there was no difference in any PROM score measured between the groups. Ten-year survivorship free from revision (components removed or added) likewise did not differ between the groups (96% [95% CI 91% to 99%] for the mechanical alignment group and 91% [95% CI 83% to 99%] for the kinematic alignment group; p = 0.38). There were two revisions in the mechanical alignment group (periprosthetic fracture, deep infection) and four in the kinematic alignment group (two secondary patella resurfacings, two deep infections). There was no statistically significant difference in reoperations for any cause between the two groups. There was no difference with regard to survivorship free from loosening on radiographic review (χ 2 = 1.3; p = 0.52) (progressive radiolucent lines seen at 10 years were 0% for mechanical alignment and 3% for kinematic alignment). Conclusion Like the 2-year and 5-year outcomes previously reported, 10-year follow-up for this RCT demonstrated no functional or radiographic difference in outcomes between mechanical alignment and kinematic alignment TKA. Anticipated functional benefits of kinematic alignment were not demonstrated, and revision-free survivorship at 10 years did not differ between the two groups. Given the unknown long-term impact of kinematic alignment with regard to implant position (especially tibial component varus), we must conclude that mechanical alignment remains the reference standard for TKA. We could not demonstrate any advantage to kinematic alignment at 10-year follow-up. Level of Evidence Level I, therapeutic study.
最长约 10秒,即可获得该文献文件

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
更新
PDF的下载单位、IP信息已删除 (2025-6-4)

科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
hwen1998完成签到 ,获得积分10
1秒前
2秒前
3秒前
wwb发布了新的文献求助10
6秒前
7秒前
9秒前
LHT完成签到,获得积分10
10秒前
落寞凌波发布了新的文献求助10
14秒前
桐桐应助幸福的杨小夕采纳,获得10
19秒前
韩麒嘉完成签到 ,获得积分10
21秒前
聪慧的凝海完成签到 ,获得积分0
30秒前
30秒前
wwb发布了新的文献求助10
33秒前
phil完成签到 ,获得积分10
33秒前
41秒前
高高菠萝完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
滴滴滴完成签到 ,获得积分10
41秒前
yangsi完成签到 ,获得积分10
44秒前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
45秒前
48秒前
酷炫葵阴发布了新的文献求助10
53秒前
ORANGE完成签到,获得积分10
55秒前
思源应助松松采纳,获得20
59秒前
共享精神应助酷炫葵阴采纳,获得10
1分钟前
丝丢皮得完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
xfy完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
阳炎完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
行云流水完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
冷酷尔琴发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
青水完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
冷酷尔琴完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
onevip完成签到,获得积分0
1分钟前
小莫完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
theseus完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
胡楠完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
高分求助中
【提示信息,请勿应助】关于scihub 10000
Les Mantodea de Guyane: Insecta, Polyneoptera [The Mantids of French Guiana] 3000
徐淮辽南地区新元古代叠层石及生物地层 3000
The Mother of All Tableaux: Order, Equivalence, and Geometry in the Large-scale Structure of Optimality Theory 3000
Handbook of Industrial Diamonds.Vol2 1100
Global Eyelash Assessment scale (GEA) 1000
Picture Books with Same-sex Parented Families: Unintentional Censorship 550
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 医学 生物 工程类 有机化学 生物化学 物理 内科学 纳米技术 计算机科学 化学工程 复合材料 遗传学 基因 物理化学 催化作用 冶金 细胞生物学 免疫学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 4038029
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 3575740
关于积分的说明 11373751
捐赠科研通 3305559
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 1819224
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 892652
科研通“疑难数据库(出版商)”最低求助积分说明 815022