计算机科学
术语
鉴定(生物学)
通路分析
代表(政治)
数据科学
图形
网络分析
拓扑数据分析
封面(代数)
理论计算机科学
数据挖掘
算法
生物
哲学
政治学
语言学
生物化学
植物
量子力学
法学
基因表达
机械工程
工程类
物理
基因
政治
作者
Tin Nguyen,Cristina Mitrea,Sorin Drăghici
摘要
Abstract Identification of impacted pathways is an important problem because it allows us to gain insights into the underlying biology beyond the detection of differentially expressed genes. In the past decade, a plethora of methods have been developed for this purpose. The last generation of pathway analysis methods are designed to take into account various aspects of pathway topology in order to increase the accuracy of the findings. Here, we cover 34 such topology‐based pathway analysis methods published in the past 13 years. We compare these methods on categories related to implementation, availability, input format, graph models, and statistical approaches used to compute pathway level statistics and statistical significance. We also discuss a number of critical challenges that need to be addressed, arising both in methodology and pathway representation, including inconsistent terminology, data format, lack of meaningful benchmarks, and, more importantly, a systematic bias that is present in most existing methods. © 2018 by John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI