清晨好,您是今天最早来到科研通的研友!由于当前在线用户较少,发布求助请尽量完整地填写文献信息,科研通机器人24小时在线,伴您科研之路漫漫前行!

Cortical Button Versus Cross-pin Femoral Fixation for Hamstring Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

医学 前交叉韧带 前交叉韧带重建术 荟萃分析 腿筋拉伤 置信区间 枢轴移位试验 随机对照试验 科克伦图书馆 相对风险 外科 前交叉韧带损伤 拉赫曼试验 内科学
作者
Hai Jiang,Guangzhi Ma,Qi Li,Yanqing Hu,Jian Li,Xin Tang
出处
期刊:American Journal of Sports Medicine [SAGE]
卷期号:46 (9): 2277-2284 被引量:23
标识
DOI:10.1177/0363546517717672
摘要

Background: Incidences of graft rupture are associated with postoperative knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Reports of postoperative knee laxity after ACL reconstruction using different femoral fixation techniques in several studies are controversial. Purpose: To compare, via meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), the clinical outcomes and postoperative knee laxity of autogenous hamstring ACL reconstruction using cortical button versus cross-pin femoral fixation. Study Design: Meta-analysis. Methods: This study followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The online PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched from inception to April 1, 2017. The study included only level 1 or 2 RCTs that compared cortical button and cross-pin femoral fixation for ACL reconstruction with hamstring autografts and that reported clinical outcomes or postoperative knee laxity. The Cochrane Collaboration’s risk of bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias for all included studies. For the meta-analysis, the investigators extracted data on clinical outcomes measured by postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score or Lysholm score and postoperative knee laxity defined as >5 mm side-to-side difference by the arthrometric measurement, Lachman test ≥2+, and pivot-shift test ≥2+. The risk ratio (RR) and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed for dichotomous data. Heterogeneity was assessed by I 2 tests. Results: A total of 6 RCTs with 445 patients were included. Statistical analysis of pooled data showed no significant difference between the cortical button and cross-pin groups on postoperative IKDC score (RR, 0.94; 95% CI, 0.88-1.02; P = .13; I 2 = 4%) and Lysholm score (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.91-1.04; P = .45; I 2 = 0%). Postoperative knee laxity was reported in 5 studies, and no significant difference was found between the 2 groups (RR, 1.49; 95% CI, 0.83-2.68; P = .18; I 2 = 37%). Conclusion: Cortical button femoral fixation for autogenous hamstring ACL reconstruction had no significant difference in terms of clinical outcomes and postoperative knee laxity compared with cross-pin femoral fixation.

科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI
科研通是完全免费的文献互助平台,具备全网最快的应助速度,最高的求助完成率。 对每一个文献求助,科研通都将尽心尽力,给求助人一个满意的交代。
实时播报
SciGPT应助王启航采纳,获得10
8秒前
14秒前
33秒前
45秒前
王启航发布了新的文献求助10
48秒前
丹青完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
1分钟前
香蕉觅云应助传统的镜子采纳,获得500
1分钟前
juliar完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
bigtree完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
诗雯_乞依安完成签到,获得积分10
1分钟前
1分钟前
把饭拼好给你完成签到 ,获得积分10
1分钟前
量子星尘发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
1分钟前
王启航发布了新的文献求助10
1分钟前
神经蛙完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
王启航发布了新的文献求助10
2分钟前
女爰舍予完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
思源应助丁青采纳,获得10
2分钟前
龙弟弟完成签到 ,获得积分10
2分钟前
2分钟前
丁青发布了新的文献求助10
3分钟前
渔婆完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
3分钟前
ding应助TT采纳,获得10
3分钟前
zyjsunye完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
科研通AI2S应助科研通管家采纳,获得10
3分钟前
慧子完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
fyy完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
carol0705完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
Karl完成签到,获得积分10
3分钟前
蛋卷完成签到 ,获得积分10
3分钟前
爱吃芒果的张小宇完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
zzgpku完成签到,获得积分0
4分钟前
min完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
Mason完成签到 ,获得积分10
4分钟前
高分求助中
(应助此贴封号)【重要!!请各用户(尤其是新用户)详细阅读】【科研通的精品贴汇总】 10000
Encyclopedia of Forensic and Legal Medicine Third Edition 5000
Agyptische Geschichte der 21.30. Dynastie 2000
中国脑卒中防治报告 1000
Variants in Economic Theory 1000
Global Ingredients & Formulations Guide 2014, Hardcover 1000
Research for Social Workers 1000
热门求助领域 (近24小时)
化学 材料科学 生物 医学 工程类 计算机科学 有机化学 物理 生物化学 纳米技术 复合材料 内科学 化学工程 人工智能 催化作用 遗传学 数学 基因 量子力学 物理化学
热门帖子
关注 科研通微信公众号,转发送积分 5823049
求助须知:如何正确求助?哪些是违规求助? 5990315
关于积分的说明 15559719
捐赠科研通 4944058
什么是DOI,文献DOI怎么找? 2663257
邀请新用户注册赠送积分活动 1609293
关于科研通互助平台的介绍 1564238