耐受性
静坐不能
安慰剂
人口
内科学
重性抑郁障碍
不利影响
医学
临床终点
心理学
随机对照试验
精神科
抗精神病药
精神分裂症(面向对象编程)
病理
替代医学
环境卫生
扁桃形结构
作者
Michael E. Thase,James M. Youakim,Aleksandar Skuban,Mary Hobart,Peter Zhang,Robert D. McQuade,Margaretta Nyilas,William H. Carson,Raymond Sanchez,Hans Eriksson
摘要
Article Abstract Objective: To evaluate efficacy, safety, and tolerability of brexpiprazole adjunctive to antidepressant treatments (ADTs) in patients with major depressive disorder (as defined by DSM-IV-TR criteria) with inadequate response to ADTs. Method: Patients still depressed despite 1-3 prior ADTs followed by 8 weeks of prospective physician-determined, open-label ADT were randomized (1:1:1) to double-blind brexpiprazole 3 mg/d, brexpiprazole 1 mg/d, or placebo for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was change in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score from baseline to week 6. The key secondary efficacy end point was change in Sheehan Disability Scale mean score. The Hochberg procedure corrected for multiplicity. The efficacy population comprised all patients who had ≥ 1 dose of study drug with baseline and ≥ 1 postrandomization MADRS scores; the efficacy population per final protocol consisted of efficacy population patients meeting amended criteria for inadequate response throughout the 8-week prospective ADT. The study was conducted between June 2011 and September 2013. Results: In the efficacy population per final protocol, brexpiprazole 3 mg (n = 213) showed a greater improvement in MADRS total score versus placebo (n = 203; −8.29 vs −6.33; P = .0079), whereas brexpiprazole 1 mg did not (n = 211; −7.64 vs −6.33; P = .0737). The brexpiprazole groups showed comparable improvement in SDS mean score versus placebo (least squares mean difference: −0.49, P = .0158; −0.48, P = .0191). The most frequent adverse events were akathisia (4.4%, 13.5%, 2.3%), headache (9.3%, 6.1%, 7.7%), and weight increase (6.6%, 5.7%, 0.9%) in brexpiprazole 1-mg, 3-mg, and placebo groups, respectively. Mean changes from baseline in Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (LS mean difference = 0.08, P = .0141) and Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (LS mean difference = 0.17, P = .0001) total scores were significantly greater with brexpiprazole 3 mg versus placebo. Conclusions: Brexpiprazole 3 mg demonstrated efficacy versus placebo in the efficacy population per final protocol. Both doses of brexpiprazole were well tolerated. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01360632
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI