反事实思维
心理学
参照物
内部一致性
认知
比例(比率)
临床心理学
应对(心理学)
心理测量学
社会心理学
发展心理学
精神科
语言学
量子力学
物理
哲学
作者
Mark S. Rye,Melissa B. Cahoon,Rahan S. Ali,Tarika Daftary
标识
DOI:10.1080/00223890701884996
摘要
We examined the psychometric properties of the newly created Counterfactual Thinking for Negative Events Scale (CTNES) in two studies involving university undergraduates. In Study 1 (N = 634), factor analysis revealed four subscales that correspond with various types of counterfactual thinking: Nonreferent Downward, Other-Referent Upward, Self-Referent Upward, and Nonreferent Upward. The subscales were largely orthogonal and had adequate internal consistency and test-retest reliability. The CTNES subscales were positively correlated with a traditional method of assessing counterfactual thinking and were related as expected to contextual aspects of the negative event, negative affect, and cognitive style. In Study 2 (N = 208), we further examined the validity of the scale and demonstrated that the subscales were sensitive to an experimental manipulation concerning the type of negative event participants recalled. Moreover, the CTNES subscales correlated in the expected direction with measures of coping and cognitive style.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI