统计
计算机化自适应测验
样本量测定
计量经济学
数学
校准
选择(遗传算法)
资本化
样品(材料)
估计
考试(生物学)
计算机科学
算法
机器学习
经济
心理测量学
生物
哲学
色谱法
语言学
古生物学
化学
管理
作者
Julio Olea,Juan Ramón Barrada,Francisco Abad,Vicente Ponsoda,Lara Cuevas
出处
期刊:Spanish Journal of Psychology
[Cambridge University Press]
日期:2012-02-08
卷期号:15 (1): 424-441
被引量:15
标识
DOI:10.5209/rev_sjop.2012.v15.n1.37348
摘要
This paper describes several simulation studies that examine the effects of capitalization on chance in the selection of items and the ability estimation in CAT, employing the 3-parameter logistic model. In order to generate different estimation errors for the item parameters, the calibration sample size was manipulated ( N = 500, 1000 and 2000 subjects) as was the ratio of item bank size to test length (banks of 197 and 788 items, test lengths of 20 and 40 items), both in a CAT and in a random test. Results show that capitalization on chance is particularly serious in CAT, as revealed by the large positive bias found in the small sample calibration conditions. For broad ranges of θ, the overestimation of the precision (asymptotic Se) reaches levels of 40%, something that does not occur with the RMSE (θ). The problem is greater as the item bank size to test length ratio increases. Potential solutions were tested in a second study, where two exposure control methods were incorporated into the item selection algorithm. Some alternative solutions are discussed.
科研通智能强力驱动
Strongly Powered by AbleSci AI